Talmud Yerushalmi
Yerushalmi Avodah Zarah 3:12 ירושלמי עבודה זרה ג׳:י״ב
Part of: Chapter 3
Reading: Hebrew · Simple EnglishHebrew · Faithful translationHebrew onlyHebrew · Simple EnglishHebrew · Faithful translationHebrew onlySimple English onlyFaithful translation onlySide by side
משנה: נָטַל מִמֶּנָּה עֵצִים אֲסוּרִין בַּהֲנָיָיה. הִסִּיק בָּהֶן אֶת הַתַּנּוּר אִם חָדָשׁ יוּתָּץ. וְאִם יָשָׁן יוּצַּן. אָפָה בוֹ אֶת הַפַּת הַפַּת אֲסוּרָה בַהֲנָיָיה. נִתְעָרְבָה בַאֲחֵרוֹת כּוּלָּן אֲסוּרוֹת בַּהֲנָאָה. רִבִּי לִיעֶזֶר אוֹמֵר יוֹלִיךְ הֲנָיָיה לְיָם הַמֶּלַח. אָמְרוּ לוֹ אֵין פִּדְיוֹן לַעֲבוֹדָה זָרָה.
MISHNAH: If he took wood from it268From an Ashera tree., it is forbidden for usufruct. If he used it to heat an oven269A portable earthenware cone., if it was new it must be destroyed270These ovens were not finished in a kiln, they became hardened by being exposed to the fire kindled in them. Therefore a new oven would be finished by the Ashera wood; it must be destroyed., if it was old it must be cooled down. If he used it to bake bread, it is forbidden for usufruct. If it was mixed with other loaves, all are forbidden for usufruct271Since loaves are sold by the piece, no loaf can be considered insignificant if mixed with others. Even without the special case of loaves of bread, “the ashes of everything burned are permitted except ashes coming from idolatry” (‘Orlah 3:3, Note 116).. Rebbi Eliezer says, he should bring his profit to the Dead Sea272Where the coins are corroded and destroyed. Obviously R. Eliezer must mean not only the profit but the entire value of the forbidden loaf.. They said to him, idols cannot be redeemed.
MISHNAH: If he took wood from it268From an Ashera tree., it is forbidden for usufruct. If he used it to heat an oven269A portable earthenware cone., if it was new it must be destroyed270These ovens were not finished in a kiln, they became hardened by being exposed to the fire kindled in them. Therefore a new oven would be finished by the Ashera wood; it must be destroyed., if it was old it must be cooled down. If he used it to bake bread, it is forbidden for usufruct. If it was mixed with other loaves, all are forbidden for usufruct271Since loaves are sold by the piece, no loaf can be considered insignificant if mixed with others. Even without the special case of loaves of bread, “the ashes of everything burned are permitted except ashes coming from idolatry” (‘Orlah 3:3, Note 116).. Rebbi Eliezer says, he should bring his profit to the Dead Sea272Where the coins are corroded and destroyed. Obviously R. Eliezer must mean not only the profit but the entire value of the forbidden loaf.. They said to him, idols cannot be redeemed.
הלכה: נָטַל מִמֶּנָּה עֵצִים כול׳. אָמַר רַב חַסְדַּאי. בִּסְתָם חֲלוּקִין. מָה נָן קַיָימִין. אִם לְהַסִּיק דִּבְרֵי הַכֹּל מוּתָּר. אִם לְעַשֵּׁן דְּבְרֵי הַכֹּל אָסוּר. אֶלָּא כֵן אֲנָן קַיָימִין בִּסְתָם.
HALAKHAH: “If he took wood from it,” etc. Rav Ḥasdai said, they are disagreeing in the indeterminate case. Where do we hold? If to heat, everybody agrees that it is permitted. If to fumigate, everybody agrees that it is forbidden. Where do we hold? In the indeterminate case273The Mishnah before R. Ḥasdai was not the text before us. He must have read: “If they (the pieces of wood) were mixed with others, …” Then R. Eliezer and the rabbis disagree about the value created by the wood coming from an Ashera. In this case the argument of Note 271 does not apply. Since idols are destroyed by burning (Note 106) it is obvious that their wood may be burned. If it is used to cook or bake anything, the profit comes only after the wood has been reduced to ashes and is no longer forbidden. But in fumigating the burning itself is the valuable act and is forbidden. R. Eliezer permits to bring the profit to the Dead Sea as long as it is not clear that the action was forbidden. The rabbis forbid everything as long as it is not clear that the action is permitted..
HALAKHAH: “If he took wood from it,” etc. Rav Ḥasdai said, they are disagreeing in the indeterminate case. Where do we hold? If to heat, everybody agrees that it is permitted. If to fumigate, everybody agrees that it is forbidden. Where do we hold? In the indeterminate case273The Mishnah before R. Ḥasdai was not the text before us. He must have read: “If they (the pieces of wood) were mixed with others, …” Then R. Eliezer and the rabbis disagree about the value created by the wood coming from an Ashera. In this case the argument of Note 271 does not apply. Since idols are destroyed by burning (Note 106) it is obvious that their wood may be burned. If it is used to cook or bake anything, the profit comes only after the wood has been reduced to ashes and is no longer forbidden. But in fumigating the burning itself is the valuable act and is forbidden. R. Eliezer permits to bring the profit to the Dead Sea as long as it is not clear that the action was forbidden. The rabbis forbid everything as long as it is not clear that the action is permitted..