Reading: Hebrew · Simple EnglishHebrew · Faithful translationHebrew onlyHebrew · Simple EnglishHebrew · Faithful translationHebrew onlySimple English onlyFaithful translation onlySide by side

4:3:1

משנה: פֵּיאָה אֵין קוֹצְרִין אוֹתָהּ בְּמַגָּלוֹת וְאֵין עוֹקְרִין אוֹתָהּ בְּקַרְדּוּמוֹת כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יַכּוּ אִישׁ אֶת רְעֵהוּ. שָׁלוֹשׁ אוֹבָּעְיוֹת בַּיּוֹם בְּשַׁחַר וּבְחַצּוֹת וּבְמִנְחָה. רַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל אוֹמֵר לֹא אָמְרוּ אֶלָּא שֶׁלֹּא יִפְחֲתוּ. וְרִבִּי עֲקִיבָה אוֹמֵר לֹא אָמְרוּ אֶלָּא שֶׁלֹּא יוֹסִיפוּ. שֶׁל בֵּית נָמֶר הָיוּ מַלְקִיטִין עַל הַחֶבֶל וְנוֹתְנִין פֵּיאָה מִכָּל אוֹמָן וְאוֹמָן.

MISHNAH: One does not harvest peah with sickles and one does not uproot it with axes so that they should not injure one another. Three investigation periods59Periods when the poor will go to the fields to see where they may collect peah. According to the interpretation of Maimonides (Mattenot Aniïm 2:17), the poor are not permitted to collect at other times. The root of the word is בעי “to question”. (The Halakhah reads אבעיות). The Halakhah will clarify the meaning of the three periods. are there during the day, in the morning, at noontime, and in the evening. Rabban Gamliel says, they decreed this only to say that one may not do less. Rebbi Aqiba says, they decreed this only to say that one may not do more60The farmer is not allowed to declare peah at any other time, when not all poor have the opportunity to be present.. In Bet Namer61Identified with Biblical Bet Nimrah (Num. 32:2) on the Jordanian side of the Jordan, a tell called Nymreïn. they insisted on collecting62The hiph‘il form, given by the overwhelming majority of manuscript sources, is a causative: The farmer made his farmhands cut the grain along ropes stretched lengthwise along the field. In this way, the entire end-strip of the field became peah, given piecemeal during the harvest. along a rope and were giving peah from every strip63Greek ὄγμος, Byzantine pronunciation oymos, “furrow in plowing, swathe in reaping,” also ὤγμος, “strip of cultivated land.”.

MISHNAH: One does not harvest peah with sickles and one does not uproot it with axes so that they should not injure one another. Three investigation periods59Periods when the poor will go to the fields to see where they may collect peah. According to the interpretation of Maimonides (Mattenot Aniïm 2:17), the poor are not permitted to collect at other times. The root of the word is בעי “to question”. (The Halakhah reads אבעיות). The Halakhah will clarify the meaning of the three periods. are there during the day, in the morning, at noontime, and in the evening. Rabban Gamliel says, they decreed this only to say that one may not do less. Rebbi Aqiba says, they decreed this only to say that one may not do more60The farmer is not allowed to declare peah at any other time, when not all poor have the opportunity to be present.. In Bet Namer61Identified with Biblical Bet Nimrah (Num. 32:2) on the Jordanian side of the Jordan, a tell called Nymreïn. they insisted on collecting62The hiph‘il form, given by the overwhelming majority of manuscript sources, is a causative: The farmer made his farmhands cut the grain along ropes stretched lengthwise along the field. In this way, the entire end-strip of the field became peah, given piecemeal during the harvest. along a rope and were giving peah from every strip63Greek ὄγμος, Byzantine pronunciation oymos, “furrow in plowing, swathe in reaping,” also ὤγμος, “strip of cultivated land.”.

4:3:2

הלכה: מַהוּ אֹבָּעְיוֹת אָמַר רִבִּי בּוֹן דְּתֵימַר אֵיךְ נֶחְפְּשׂוּ עֵשָׂיו נִבְּעוּ מַצְפּוּנָיו.

HALAKHAH: What are אֹבָּעְיוֹת? Rebbi Abun said, just as you say (Ob. 6): “How was Esau searched out, his hidden places investigated64The root בעה in Obadiah has a meaning close to Rabbinic Aramaic בעי..”

HALAKHAH: What are אֹבָּעְיוֹת? Rebbi Abun said, just as you say (Ob. 6): “How was Esau searched out, his hidden places investigated64The root בעה in Obadiah has a meaning close to Rabbinic Aramaic בעי..”

4:3:3

בְּשַׁחַר וּבְחַצּוֹת וּבְמִנְחָה. בְּשַׁחַר מִפְּנֵי הַמֵּנִיקוֹת. וּבְחַצּוֹת מִפְּנֵי הַתִּינוֹקוֹת. וּבְמִנְחָה מִפְּנֵי הַנְּמוּשׁוֹת.

“In the morning, at noontime, and in the evening.” In the morning because of nursing women. At noontime because of the children. In the evening, because of the decrepit65The old people; from the root משש “to totter.”.

“In the morning, at noontime, and in the evening.” In the morning because of nursing women. At noontime because of the children. In the evening, because of the decrepit65The old people; from the root משש “to totter.”.

4:3:4

רַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל אוֹמֵר לֹא אָמְרוּ אֶלָּא כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יִפְחֲתוּ וְאִם רָצָה לְהוֹסִיף מוֹסִיף. רִבִּי עֲקִיבָה אוֹמֵר לֹא אָמְרוּ אֶלָּא כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יוֹסִיפוּ. הָא אִם רָצָה לִפְחוֹת אֵינוֹ פּוֹחֵת.

“Rabban Gamliel says, they decreed this only to say that one may not do less;” if he wants to add, he may add. “Rebbi Aqiba says, they decreed this only to say that one may not do more;” does this mean that if he wants to give less frequently he may not do so?

“Rabban Gamliel says, they decreed this only to say that one may not do less;” if he wants to add, he may add. “Rebbi Aqiba says, they decreed this only to say that one may not do more;” does this mean that if he wants to give less frequently he may not do so?

4:3:5

שֶׁל בֵּית נָמֶר הָיוּ מַלְקִיטִין אוֹתָהּ עִם הַחֶבֶל וְנוֹתְנִין פֵּיאָה מִכָּל אוּמָן וְאוּמָן. תַּנִּי אַבָּא שָׁאוּל אוֹמֵר מַזְכִּירִין אוֹתָן לִגְנַאי וּמַזְכִּירִין אוֹתָן לִשְׁבָח. מַזְכִּירִין אוֹתָן לִגְנַיי שֶׁהָיוּ נוֹתְנִין פֵּיאָה אֶחָד מִמֵּאָה. וּמַזְכִּירִין אוֹתָן לִשְׁבָח שֶׁהָיוּ מַלְקִיטִין אוֹתָן עִם הַחֶבֶל וְנוֹתְנִין פֵּיאָה מִכָּל אוּמָן וְאוּמָן.

“Those of Bet Namer insisted on collecting along a rope and were giving peah from every strip.” It was stated: Abba Shaul says, one mentions them disapprovingly and one mentions them approvingly. One mentions them disapprovingly because they only gave peah of one percent67And not 1⅔% as required by rabbinical ordinance.. And one mentions them approvingly because they insisted on collecting along a rope and were giving peah from every strip.

“Those of Bet Namer insisted on collecting along a rope and were giving peah from every strip.” It was stated: Abba Shaul says, one mentions them disapprovingly and one mentions them approvingly. One mentions them disapprovingly because they only gave peah of one percent67And not 1⅔% as required by rabbinical ordinance.. And one mentions them approvingly because they insisted on collecting along a rope and were giving peah from every strip.

4:3:6

תַּנִּי בְּשֵׁם רִבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן מִפְּנֵי חֲמִשָּׁה דְּבָרִים לֹא יִתֵּן אָדָם פֵּיאָה אֶלָּא בְסוֹף שָׂדֵהוּ. מִפְּנֵי גֶּזֶל עֲנִיִים. וּמִפְּנֵי בִיטּוּל עֲנִיִים. וּמִפְּנֵי הָרַמָּאִין. וּמִפְּנֵי מַרְאִית הָעַיִן. וּמִשּׁוּם שֶׁאָמְרָה תוֹרָה לֹא תְכַלֶּה פְּאַת שָׂדְךָ. מִפְּנֵי גֶּזֶל עֲנִיִים כֵּיצַד שֶׁלֹּא יִרְאֶה אָדָם אֶת הַשָּׁעָה פְּנוּיָה וְיֹאמַר לִקְרוֹבוֹ עָנִי בּוֹא וְטוּל לָךְ אֶת הַפֵּיאָה. מִפְּנֵי בִיטּוּל עֲנִיִים כֵּיצַד שֶׁלֹּא יְהוּ עֲנִיִים יוֹשְׁבִין וּמְשַׁמְּרִין כָּל הַיּוֹם וְאוֹמְרִים עַכְשָׁיו הוּא נוֹתֵן פֵּיאָה עַכְשָׁיו נוֹתֵן פֵּיאָה אֶלָּא יֵלְכוּ וִילַקְּטוּ בְשָׂדֶה אֲחֶרֶת וְיָבוֹאוּ בִשְׁעַת הַכִּילּוּי. מִפְּנֵי הָרַמָּאִין כֵּיצַד שֶׁלֹּא יֹאמַר כְּבָר נָתַתִּי וִיהֵא בּוֹרֵר אֶת הַיָּפֶה וּמוֹצִיא אֶת הָרָע. מִפְּנֵי מַרְאִית הָעַיִן כֵּיצַד שֶׁלֹּא יְהוּ הָעוֹבְרִים וְהַשָּׁבִים אוֹמְרִים רְאוּ הֵיאַךְ קָצַר אִישׁ פְּלוֹנִי שָׂדֵהוּ וְלֹא הִנִּיחַ פֵּיאָה לָעֲנִיִים. וּמִשּׁוּם שֶׁאָמְרָה תוֹרָה לֹא תְכַלֶּה פְּאַת שָׂדְךָ.

It was stated69There are parallels in Tosephta Peah 1:6, Sifra Qedošim 1:10, Babli Šabbat 23a. In all these parallels, there are four reasons given, meaning that R. Simeon explains the reason of the Biblical law. In the Babli, R. Simeon is reputed to deduce laws from the reasoning behind Biblical precepts; the Yerushalmi does not seem to accept this but gives reasons separate from the verse. (The Tosephta in our hands is essentially a Babylonian compilation; Sifra is Palestinian material edited in Babylonia.) It is clear that R. Simeon supports here his argument in Mishnah 1:3 that peah must be given at the end, because of Biblical precept and rabbinical ordinance. in the name of Rebbi Simeon: For five reasons one should give peah only at the end of one’s field, because of robbing the poor, because of idling the poor, because of cheats, because of bad impression, and because the Torah said (Lev. 19:9): “Do not finish off the corner of your field.” Because of robbing the poor, that no man should see a free hour and say to his poor relative: Come, and take this peah for yourself. Because of idling the poor, that the poor should not sit around, watch the entire day, and say: Now he is giving peah, now he is giving peah, but rather they should go, collect on another field, and come at the moment of finishing. Because of the cheats, that one should not say: I already gave, and then he chooses the good and brings out the bad70We are not concerned here with people who willingly transgress the ordinances of the Torah. Rather, we speak about so-called pious people who find ways to minimize their obligations. In this case, the farmer harvests the entire field without giving peah. Then he is obligated to give peah from the cut grain but here he has the possibility to select stalks with small kernels for the poor, whereas he has no such control if he refrains from cutting the last corner.. Because of bad impression, that the passers-by should not say: Look, this man harvested his field and did not leave peah for the poor. And because the Torah said: “Do not finish off the corner of your field.”

It was stated69There are parallels in Tosephta Peah 1:6, Sifra Qedošim 1:10, Babli Šabbat 23a. In all these parallels, there are four reasons given, meaning that R. Simeon explains the reason of the Biblical law. In the Babli, R. Simeon is reputed to deduce laws from the reasoning behind Biblical precepts; the Yerushalmi does not seem to accept this but gives reasons separate from the verse. (The Tosephta in our hands is essentially a Babylonian compilation; Sifra is Palestinian material edited in Babylonia.) It is clear that R. Simeon supports here his argument in Mishnah 1:3 that peah must be given at the end, because of Biblical precept and rabbinical ordinance. in the name of Rebbi Simeon: For five reasons one should give peah only at the end of one’s field, because of robbing the poor, because of idling the poor, because of cheats, because of bad impression, and because the Torah said (Lev. 19:9): “Do not finish off the corner of your field.” Because of robbing the poor, that no man should see a free hour and say to his poor relative: Come, and take this peah for yourself. Because of idling the poor, that the poor should not sit around, watch the entire day, and say: Now he is giving peah, now he is giving peah, but rather they should go, collect on another field, and come at the moment of finishing. Because of the cheats, that one should not say: I already gave, and then he chooses the good and brings out the bad70We are not concerned here with people who willingly transgress the ordinances of the Torah. Rather, we speak about so-called pious people who find ways to minimize their obligations. In this case, the farmer harvests the entire field without giving peah. Then he is obligated to give peah from the cut grain but here he has the possibility to select stalks with small kernels for the poor, whereas he has no such control if he refrains from cutting the last corner.. Because of bad impression, that the passers-by should not say: Look, this man harvested his field and did not leave peah for the poor. And because the Torah said: “Do not finish off the corner of your field.”

Texts

  • Hebrew: The Jerusalem Talmud, edition by Heinrich W. Guggenheimer. Berlin, De Gruyter, 1999-2015 · License: CC-BY
  • English: The Jerusalem Talmud, translation and commentary by Heinrich W. Guggenheimer. Berlin, De Gruyter, 1999-2015 · License: CC-BY

Where next