Reading: Hebrew · Simple EnglishHebrew · Faithful translationHebrew onlyHebrew · Simple EnglishHebrew · Faithful translationHebrew onlySimple English onlyFaithful translation onlySide by side

1:1:1

משנה: אוֹר לְאַרְבָּעָה עָשָׂר בּוֹדְקִין אֶת הֶחָמֵץ לְאוֹר הַנֵּר. כָּל מָקוֹם שֶׁאֵין מַכְנִיסִין בּוֹ חָמֵץ אֵינוֹ צָרִיךְ בְּדִיקָה. וּבַמֶּה אָמְרוּ שְׁתֵּי שׁוּרוֹת בַּמַּרְתֵּף מָקוֹם שֶׁמַּכְנִיסִין בּוֹ חָמֵץ. בֵּית שַׁמַּאי אוֹמְרִים שְׁתֵּי שׁוּרוֹת עַל פְּנֵי כָל הַמַּרְתֵּף וּבֵית הִלֵּל אוֹמְרִים שְׁתֵּי שׁוּרוֹת הַחִיצוֹנוֹת שֶׁהֵן הָעֶלְיוֹנוֹת:

MISHNAH: At nightfall of the Fourteenth one checks leavened matter by candle light. A place into which no leavened matter is introduced does not need checking. And where1The Babli and Maimonides read ולמה “why” instead of ובמה “where”. did they say two rows in the cellar2The storage place for wine or oil amphoras. While this is not a place where one usually stores leavened matter it is possible that the person who is asked to bring a barrel of wine or oil for household use is eating some bread and deposits it temporarily near the entrance door. Therefore it needs checking except for a wholesaler’s cellar.? A place where one introduces leavened matter. The House of Shammai are saying two rows in the front of the entire cellar3The amphoras are arranged in a rectangular pattern. The House of Shammai requires checking of two rows in all directions accessible from the door. Since usually one starts arranging the amphoras starting at two walls meeting at an angle, the outer rows at the other two sides of the rectangular arrangement have to be checked., but the House of Hillel are saying the outermost two rows which are the uppermost4Only the rows facing the door have to be checked. If the amphoras also are stacked on top of one another, the two top rows facing the door have to be checked..

MISHNAH: At nightfall of the Fourteenth one checks leavened matter by candle light. A place into which no leavened matter is introduced does not need checking. And where1The Babli and Maimonides read ולמה “why” instead of ובמה “where”. did they say two rows in the cellar2The storage place for wine or oil amphoras. While this is not a place where one usually stores leavened matter it is possible that the person who is asked to bring a barrel of wine or oil for household use is eating some bread and deposits it temporarily near the entrance door. Therefore it needs checking except for a wholesaler’s cellar.? A place where one introduces leavened matter. The House of Shammai are saying two rows in the front of the entire cellar3The amphoras are arranged in a rectangular pattern. The House of Shammai requires checking of two rows in all directions accessible from the door. Since usually one starts arranging the amphoras starting at two walls meeting at an angle, the outer rows at the other two sides of the rectangular arrangement have to be checked., but the House of Hillel are saying the outermost two rows which are the uppermost4Only the rows facing the door have to be checked. If the amphoras also are stacked on top of one another, the two top rows facing the door have to be checked..

1:1:2

הלכה: אוֹר לְאַרְבָּעָה עָשָׂר כול׳. כָּתוּב וּשְׁמַרְתֶּם אֶת הַמַּצּוֹת כִּי בְּעֶצֶם הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה הוֹצֵאתִי אֶת צִבְאוֹתֵיכֶם מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם. בָּרִאשׁוֹן בְּאַרְבָּעָה עָשָׂר יוֹם לַחוֹדֶשׁ בָּעֶרֶב תֹּאכְלוּ מַצּוֹת וגו׳. מָה אֲנָן קַיָימִין. אִם לַאֲכִילַת מַצָּה. כְּבָר כָּתוּב שִׁבְעַת יָמִים מַצּוֹת תֹּאכֵלוּ. וְאִם לוֹמַר שֶׁמַּתְחִיל בְּאַרְבָּעָה עָשָׂר. וְהָכְתִיב עַד יוֹם הָאֶחָד וְעֶשְׂרִים לַחוֹדֶשׁ. אֶלָּא אִם אֵינוֹ עִנְיָין לַאֲכִילַת מַצָּה תְּנֵיהוּ עִנְיָין לְבִיעוּר חָמֵץ.

HALAKHAH: “At nightfall of the fourteenth,” etc. It is written5Ex. 12:17–18.: You shall guard the mazzot, because on this same day I took out your multitudes fromthe Land of Egypt. On the first, on the fourteenth of the month, in the evening, you shall eat mazzot, etc. Where do we hold6What means on the first? Does it mean on the first month, or on the first day of the holidays?? If for eating mazzah, is it not already written, seven days you shall eat mazzot7Ex. 12:15.? Or if to say that one starts on the Fourteenth, is it not written, until the twenty-first of the month5Ex. 12:17–18.? But if it is not needed as a reference to the eating of mazzah, take it as a reference to the elimination of leavened matter8As usual, the argument partially refers to parts of the verse which are not quoted in the text. It says in 12:15, seven days you shall eat mazzot, only on the first day you shall eliminate sour dough from your houses. No calendar date has been given. One could read v. 17 to state that mazzot have to be eaten and leavened matter eliminated on the 14th. This is impossible since the same verse states that the seventh day is the 21st. Therefore the obligation to eat mazzot starts in the evening preceding the 15th. Since it is accepted doctrine that the calendar day starts at nightfall of the preceding night, the reference to the 14th cannot possibly refer to eating, but must give the date of the elimination of leavened matter for which the search in the preceding night is a preparation..

HALAKHAH: “At nightfall of the fourteenth,” etc. It is written5Ex. 12:17–18.: You shall guard the mazzot, because on this same day I took out your multitudes fromthe Land of Egypt. On the first, on the fourteenth of the month, in the evening, you shall eat mazzot, etc. Where do we hold6What means on the first? Does it mean on the first month, or on the first day of the holidays?? If for eating mazzah, is it not already written, seven days you shall eat mazzot7Ex. 12:15.? Or if to say that one starts on the Fourteenth, is it not written, until the twenty-first of the month5Ex. 12:17–18.? But if it is not needed as a reference to the eating of mazzah, take it as a reference to the elimination of leavened matter8As usual, the argument partially refers to parts of the verse which are not quoted in the text. It says in 12:15, seven days you shall eat mazzot, only on the first day you shall eliminate sour dough from your houses. No calendar date has been given. One could read v. 17 to state that mazzot have to be eaten and leavened matter eliminated on the 14th. This is impossible since the same verse states that the seventh day is the 21st. Therefore the obligation to eat mazzot starts in the evening preceding the 15th. Since it is accepted doctrine that the calendar day starts at nightfall of the preceding night, the reference to the 14th cannot possibly refer to eating, but must give the date of the elimination of leavened matter for which the search in the preceding night is a preparation..

1:1:3

לָמָּה לְאוֹר הַנֵּר. אָמַר רִבִּי שְׁמוּאֵל בַּר רַב יִצְחָק. מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהַנֵּר בּוֹדֵק כָּל שֶׁהוּא. לָמָּה בַלַּיְלָה. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵה. שֶׁאֵין בְּדִיקַת הַנֵּר יָפָה אֶלָּא בַלַּיְלָה. רִבִּי מָנָא לֹא אָמַר כֵּן. וּשְׁמַרְתֶּם אֶת הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה לְדֹרֹתֵיכֶם לְחוּקַּת עוֹלָם. עֲשֵׂה שֶׁיְּהוּ הַיּוֹם וְהַלַּיְלָה מְשׁוּמָּרִין. וְיַתְחִיל בִּשְׁלֹשָׁה עָשָׂר וִיְהֵא הַיּוֹם וְהַלַּיְלָה מְשׁוּמָּרִין. אַף אִית לֵיהּ כַּיי דָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵי. וְיַתְחִיל אוֹר לִשְׁלֹשָׁה עָשָׂר. אִין כֵּינִי יִבְדּוֹק אֲפִילוּ מֵרֹאשׁ חוֹדֶשׁ.

Why by candlelight? Rebbi Samuel bar Rav Isaac said, because a candle permits checking everywhere9In holes and crevices which are dark in daytime (Babli 8a). The “candle” mentioned here is a small clay vessel filled with oil.. Why in the night? Rebbi Yose said, because checking with a candle is exact only during night time10As stated later, candle light is not effective during daytime.. Rebbi Mana did not say so: And guard this day for your generations as an eternal law5Ex. 12:17–18., see to it that day and night be guarded11The entire day should be dedicated to the elimination of leavened matter.. Then should one not start on the Thirteenth that day and night be guarded? He also agrees with the statement of Rebbi Yose12One cannot say that R. Mana disagrees with R. Yose; he adds to his statement.. Then should one start in the evening of the Thirteenth? If so, he could even check on the beginning of the month13Since checking two weeks in advance would be useless, so is checking a full day in advance. Since checking should be done at nighttime, the only remaining date is the evening of the 14th of Nisan (preceding the day)..

Why by candlelight? Rebbi Samuel bar Rav Isaac said, because a candle permits checking everywhere9In holes and crevices which are dark in daytime (Babli 8a). The “candle” mentioned here is a small clay vessel filled with oil.. Why in the night? Rebbi Yose said, because checking with a candle is exact only during night time10As stated later, candle light is not effective during daytime.. Rebbi Mana did not say so: And guard this day for your generations as an eternal law5Ex. 12:17–18., see to it that day and night be guarded11The entire day should be dedicated to the elimination of leavened matter.. Then should one not start on the Thirteenth that day and night be guarded? He also agrees with the statement of Rebbi Yose12One cannot say that R. Mana disagrees with R. Yose; he adds to his statement.. Then should one start in the evening of the Thirteenth? If so, he could even check on the beginning of the month13Since checking two weeks in advance would be useless, so is checking a full day in advance. Since checking should be done at nighttime, the only remaining date is the evening of the 14th of Nisan (preceding the day)..

1:1:4

רִבִּי יִרְמְיָה אָמַר רִבִּי שְׁמוּאֵל בַּר רַב יִצְחָק בָּעֵי. מָהוּ לִבְדּוֹק לְאוֹר הָאֲבוּקוֹת. מַה צְרִיכָה לֵיהּ. מִפְּנֵי שֶׁאוֹרָן מַבְלִיחַ. רִבִּי שְׁמוּאֵל בַּר רַב יִצְחָק כְּדַעְתֵּיהּ. דְּרִבִּי שְׁמוּאֵל בַּר רַב יִצְחָק אָמַר. מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהַנֵּר בּוֹדֵק כָּל שֶׁהוּא. אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁאֵין רְאָיָה לְדָבָר זֶיכֶר לְדָבָר. וְהָיָה בַּיּוֹם הָהוּא אֲחַפֵּשׂ אֶת יְרוּשָׁלַם בַּנֵּרוֹת. וְאִית דְּבָעֵי אֵימַר. נִישְׁמְעִינָהּ מִן הָדָא. נֵר יְי נִשְׁמַת אָדָם חוֹפֵשׂ כָּל חַדְרֵי בָטֶן.

Rebbi Jeremiah said that Rebbi Samuel bar Rav Isaac asked: May one check by the light of torches? What is his problem? Because their light is unsteady14Since the light is unsteady, it does not serve in searching nooks and crannies.. Rebbi Samuel bar Rav Isaac is consistent since Rebbi Samuel bar Rav Isaac said, because a candle permits checking everywhere15The scribe wrote בודק כל שהוא כל שהוא “checking extremely well everywhere.” The second כל שהוא was deleted by the corrector; probably incorrectly.. [16Tosephta Pisha 1:1; corrector’s addition. Even though it is not proof of the matter, it is an allusion to the matter: It shall be on that day17Misquote from memory.that I shall search Jerusalem by candles18Zeph. 1:12, Babli 7b–8a.. But some want to say,] one can understand it from the following: A candle of the Eternal is a person’s soul, it searches all rooms of the body19Prov. 20:27, Babli 7b–8a..

Rebbi Jeremiah said that Rebbi Samuel bar Rav Isaac asked: May one check by the light of torches? What is his problem? Because their light is unsteady14Since the light is unsteady, it does not serve in searching nooks and crannies.. Rebbi Samuel bar Rav Isaac is consistent since Rebbi Samuel bar Rav Isaac said, because a candle permits checking everywhere15The scribe wrote בודק כל שהוא כל שהוא “checking extremely well everywhere.” The second כל שהוא was deleted by the corrector; probably incorrectly.. [16Tosephta Pisha 1:1; corrector’s addition. Even though it is not proof of the matter, it is an allusion to the matter: It shall be on that day17Misquote from memory.that I shall search Jerusalem by candles18Zeph. 1:12, Babli 7b–8a.. But some want to say,] one can understand it from the following: A candle of the Eternal is a person’s soul, it searches all rooms of the body19Prov. 20:27, Babli 7b–8a..

1:1:5

אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵה. מַתְנִיתָא אָמְרָה שֶׁבְּדִיקַת הַיּוֹם בְּדִיקָה. דְּתַנִּינָן. רִבִּי יוּדָה אוֹמֵר. בּוֹדְקִין אוֹר לְאַרְבָּעָה עָשָׂר וּבְאַרְבָּעָה עָשָׂר בְּשַׁחֲרִית וּבִשְׁעַת הַבִּיעוּר. לֹא סוֹף דָּבָר רִבִּי יוּדָה אֶלָּא אֲפִילוּ דְרַבָּנִין. דְּתַנִּינָן. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים אִם לֹא בָדַק אוֹר לְאַרְבָּעָה עָשָׂר יִבְדּוֹק בְּאַרְבָּעָה עָשָׂר.

Rebbi Yose said, the Mishnah implies that checking during daytime is called checking, as we have stated20Mishnah 3.: “Rebbi Jehudah says, one checks at nightfall of the Fourteenth, and on the Fourteenth, and at the moment of elimination.” Not only Rebbi Jehudah but even the rabbis, as we have stated: “If he did not check at nightfall of the Fourteenth he shall check on the Fourteenth.”

Rebbi Yose said, the Mishnah implies that checking during daytime is called checking, as we have stated20Mishnah 3.: “Rebbi Jehudah says, one checks at nightfall of the Fourteenth, and on the Fourteenth, and at the moment of elimination.” Not only Rebbi Jehudah but even the rabbis, as we have stated: “If he did not check at nightfall of the Fourteenth he shall check on the Fourteenth.”

1:1:6

וְצָרִיךְ לִבְדּוֹק לָאוֹר הַנֵּר. נִישְׁמְעִינָהּ מִן הָדָא. אֵין בּוֹדְקִין לֹא לְאוֹר הַחַמָּה וְלֹא לְאוֹר הַלְּבָנָה וְלֹא לְאוֹר הַכּוֹכָבִים אֶלָּא לְאוֹר הַנֵּר. נִיחָא לֹא לְאוֹר הַלְּבָנָה וְלֹא לְאוֹר הַכּוֹכָבִים (וְלֹא) [אֶלָּא] לְאוֹר חַמָּה. וְכִי יֵשׁ חַמָּה בַלַּיְלָה. הָדָא אָמְרַה. אֲפִילוּ בַיּוֹם צָרִיךְ לִבְדּוֹק לְאוֹר הַנֵּר. לֹא סוֹף דָּבָר בַּיִת שֶׁאֵין בּוֹ אוֹרָה. אֶלָּא אֲפִילוּ בַּיִת שֶׁיֵּשׁ בּוֹ אוֹרָה אֲפִילו בְיוֹם צָרִיךְ לִבְדּוֹק לְאוֹר הַנֵּר.

Is it obligatory to check by candlelight21When checking during daytime, even following the rabbis.? Let us hear from the following22Tosephta 1:1, Babli 7b. “One checks neither by sunlight, nor by moonlight, nor by starlight, but by candlelight.” One understands “neither by moonlight, nor by starlight,” but “neither by sunlight”? Is there any sun in the night? This implies, even during daytime one has to check by candlelight; not only in a house without light, but even in a house which has light, even during daytime, it is necessary to check by candlelight.

Is it obligatory to check by candlelight21When checking during daytime, even following the rabbis.? Let us hear from the following22Tosephta 1:1, Babli 7b. “One checks neither by sunlight, nor by moonlight, nor by starlight, but by candlelight.” One understands “neither by moonlight, nor by starlight,” but “neither by sunlight”? Is there any sun in the night? This implies, even during daytime one has to check by candlelight; not only in a house without light, but even in a house which has light, even during daytime, it is necessary to check by candlelight.

1:1:7

מְבוֹאוֹת הָאֲפֵילִין מָהוּ שֶׁיְּהֵא צָרִיךְ לְבוֹדְקָן כַּתְּחִילָּה לְאוֹר הַנֵּר. מִילֵּיהוֹן דְּרַבָּנִין אָמְרִין. לֹא כְמַה דְהוּא מִנְהַר בַּלַּיְלִיָּא הוּא מִנְהַר בַּיְּמָמָא. דְּאָמַר רַב הוּנָא. כַּד הֲוִינָן עָרָקִין בְּאִילֵּין בּוֹטִיתָא דְּסִדְרָא רַבָּא הָיוּ מַדְלִיקִין עָלֵינוּ נֵירוֹת. בְּשָׁעָה שֶׁהָיוּ כֵיהִים הָיִינוּ יוֹדְעִין שֶׁהוּא יוֹם. וּבְשָׁעָה שֶׁהָיוּ מַבְהִיקִין הָיִינוּ יוֹדְעִין שֶׁהוּא לַיְלָה. וַתְיָיא כַיי דָמַר רִבִּי אַחֲוָוא בַּר זְעִירָא. נֹחַ בִּכְנִיסָתוֹ לַתֵּיבָה הִכְנִיס עִמּוֹ אֲבָנִים טוֹבוֹת וּמַרְגָּלִיּוֹת. בְּשָׁעָה שֶׁהָיוּ כֵיהוֹת הָיָה יוֹדֵעַ שֶׁהוּא יוֹם. וּבְשָׁעָה שֶׁהָיוּ מַבְהִיקוֹת הָיָה יוֹדֵעַ שֶׁהוּא לַיְלָה. לָמָּה. יֵשׁ חַיָּה אוֹכֶלֶת בַּיּוֹם וְיֵשׁ חַיָּה אוֹכֶלֶת בַּלַּיְלָה. וְהָא כְתִיב צוֹהַר תַּעֲשֶׂה לַתֵּיבָה. כְּמָאן דְּאָמַר. לֹא שִׁימְשׁוּ הַמַּזָּלוֹת בִּשְׁנַת הַמַּבּוּל.

May one23This translation of צריך follows S. Liebermann. check dark passages24Roofed public spaces. purposely25As the parallel expression in the next paragraph shows, a word “during daytime” is missing here. by candlelight? The words of the rabbis imply that not as it radiates at night it radiates during the day, 26Gen. r. 31:12, a much better text. As given here, the story is Babylonian and there is no reason why they should be fleeing, and why the earth under the place (under the open sky) where the twice-yearly assembly of scholars was held should have been tunnelled. In Gen. rabba the name is Rebbi Huna, the place is Tiberias, and they were hiding from soldiers. as Rav Huna said, when we were fleeing to these catacombs of the great assembly they were lighting candles for us. When they were faint, we knew that it was day; when they were bright we knew that it was night. This parallels what Rebbi Aḥawa bar Ze`ira27The son of R. Zeˋira. In Gen. r. “R. Phineas in the name of R. Zeˋira”. In the Babli Sanhedrin 108b is a similar statement of R. Joḥanan. said, when Noah entered the Ark he brought with him precious stones and pearls. When they were dull, he knew that it was daytime; when they were shiny he knew that it was nighttime.Why? There are animals eating at daytime and there are animals eating at nighttime. But is there not written, make a skylight to the ark28Gen. 6:16.? Following him who said that the stars were not operative in the year of the flood29Gen. r. 25:2, interpretation of Gen.8:22..

May one23This translation of צריך follows S. Liebermann. check dark passages24Roofed public spaces. purposely25As the parallel expression in the next paragraph shows, a word “during daytime” is missing here. by candlelight? The words of the rabbis imply that not as it radiates at night it radiates during the day, 26Gen. r. 31:12, a much better text. As given here, the story is Babylonian and there is no reason why they should be fleeing, and why the earth under the place (under the open sky) where the twice-yearly assembly of scholars was held should have been tunnelled. In Gen. rabba the name is Rebbi Huna, the place is Tiberias, and they were hiding from soldiers. as Rav Huna said, when we were fleeing to these catacombs of the great assembly they were lighting candles for us. When they were faint, we knew that it was day; when they were bright we knew that it was night. This parallels what Rebbi Aḥawa bar Ze`ira27The son of R. Zeˋira. In Gen. r. “R. Phineas in the name of R. Zeˋira”. In the Babli Sanhedrin 108b is a similar statement of R. Joḥanan. said, when Noah entered the Ark he brought with him precious stones and pearls. When they were dull, he knew that it was daytime; when they were shiny he knew that it was nighttime.Why? There are animals eating at daytime and there are animals eating at nighttime. But is there not written, make a skylight to the ark28Gen. 6:16.? Following him who said that the stars were not operative in the year of the flood29Gen. r. 25:2, interpretation of Gen.8:22..

1:1:8

רִבִּי יִרְמְיָה בָעֵי. בָּתֵּי כְנֵיסִיּוֹת וּבָתֵּי מִדְרָשׁוֹת מָהוּ שֶׁיְּהוּ צְרִיכִין בְּדִיקָה. מַה צְרִיכָה לֵיהּ. שֶׁכֵּן מַכְנִיסִין לְשָׁם בְּאִבָּרִיּוּת וּבְרָאשֵׁי חֳדָשִׁים. וַתֵי פְשִׁיטָא לֵיהּ וְהָכֵנִי צְרִיכָה לֵיהּ. הוֹאִיל וְאוֹרָן מְרוּבֶּה. מָהוּ שֶׁיְּהֵא צָרִיךְ לְבוֹדְקָן כַּתְּחִילָּה בַיּוֹם לְאוֹר הַנֵּר.

Rebbi Jeremiah asked: Do synagogues and houses of study need checking? What is his problem? Since one brings30In general it is forbidden to bring food into a synagogue or study hall proper, but for a meal accompanying the public declaration of the new month or the additional month one brought food there, bread and vegetables (Babli Sanhedrin 70b) or grapes and bread (Yerushalmi Berakhot6:4, Note 149). there for intercalations31In a responsum of R. Nissim of Kairawan (Teshuvot Hegaonim Lyck, #105) and the Frankfurt ms. of Or zarua II §453, עיבריות. Even the word spelled with א is interpreted as if written with ע, “intercalations”; J. N. Epstein, Tarbiz 5 (1933–34) p. 263. In the printed editions of the Yerushalmi, following a correction on the margin of the ms., “on Sabbaths” (cf. R. Nissim loc. cit., p. 34). and on the days of the New Moon. It should be obvious for him32That one has to check, even if the place was not usually used for public meals., but what really is his problem? Since they are very well illuminated, may one check them purposely during daytime by candlelight33And not in the evening of the 14th, when people are occupied in their own houses. Since no answer is given, theˋ answer is negative.?

Rebbi Jeremiah asked: Do synagogues and houses of study need checking? What is his problem? Since one brings30In general it is forbidden to bring food into a synagogue or study hall proper, but for a meal accompanying the public declaration of the new month or the additional month one brought food there, bread and vegetables (Babli Sanhedrin 70b) or grapes and bread (Yerushalmi Berakhot6:4, Note 149). there for intercalations31In a responsum of R. Nissim of Kairawan (Teshuvot Hegaonim Lyck, #105) and the Frankfurt ms. of Or zarua II §453, עיבריות. Even the word spelled with א is interpreted as if written with ע, “intercalations”; J. N. Epstein, Tarbiz 5 (1933–34) p. 263. In the printed editions of the Yerushalmi, following a correction on the margin of the ms., “on Sabbaths” (cf. R. Nissim loc. cit., p. 34). and on the days of the New Moon. It should be obvious for him32That one has to check, even if the place was not usually used for public meals., but what really is his problem? Since they are very well illuminated, may one check them purposely during daytime by candlelight33And not in the evening of the 14th, when people are occupied in their own houses. Since no answer is given, theˋ answer is negative.?

1:1:9

רִבִּי יוֹסֵה בְעֵי. חֲצֵירוֹת שֶׁבִּירוּשָׁלִַם שֶׁאוֹכְלִין שָׁם חַלּוֹת תּוֹדָה וּרְקִיקֵי נְזִיר. מָהוּ שֶׁיְּהוּ צְרִיכִין בְּדִיקָה. בְּלֹא כָּךְ אֵינָן בְּדוּקוֹת מִן הַנּוֹתָר. יָיבֹא כְהָדָא תַנָּא רִבִּי זְכַרְיָה חַתְנֵי דְּרִבִּי לֵוִי. נִידָּה חוֹפֶפֶת וְסוֹרֶקֶת. [כֹּהֶנֶת אֵינָהּ חוֹפֶפֶת וְסוֹרֶקֶת. נִדָּה כֹהֶנֶת חוֹפֶפֶת וְסוֹרֶקֶת.] שֶׁלֹּא תַחֲלוֹק בֵּין נִידָּה לְנִידָּה. אוֹף הָכָא שֶׁלֹּא לַחֲלוֹק בֵּין בִּיעוּר לְבִיעוּר. תַּנֵּי רִבִּי גַמְלִיאֵל בַּר אִינְיָינָא קוֹמֵי רִבִּי מָנָא. נִידָּה שֶׂהִיא מַפְסֶקֶת כָּל שִׁבְעָה חוֹפֶפֶת וְסוֹרֶקֶת. כּוֹהֶנֶת שֶׁהִיא טוֹבֶלֶת בְּכָל יוֹם אֵינָהּ חוֹפֶפֶת וְאֵינָהּ סוֹרֶקֶת. אָמַר לֵיהּ. לְשׁוֹמֶרֶת יוֹם כְּנֶגֶד יוֹם נִצְרְכָה.

Rebbi Yose asked: The courtyards in Jerusalem where one eats the bread of thanksgiving offerings34Which have an obligatory component of leavened bread, Lev. 7:13. and the wafers of a nazir35Part of the offering of the nazir at the fulfillment of his vow, Num. 6:15. These are unleavened., do they need checking? Are they not checked anyhow for leftovers36Since any leftovers from any well-being offering, including the thanksgiving offering, must be burned (Lev.7:17), every day of the year these localities are treated the way every other dwelling is treated on Passover Eve.? It should be parallel to what Rebbi Zachariah the son-in-law of Rebbi Levi stated: A menstruating woman washes her hair and combs37She becomes pure by immersing all her body in water. Therefore it is imperative that not two hairs cling together; before immersion she has to make sure that this does not happen.. A priestly woman does not wash her hair and comb38The wife, unmarried daughter, or slave of a Cohen who participate with the Cohen in eating heave and other sancta. As long as the rules of purity could be kept, these women, together with the Cohen, have to immerse themselves every day close to sundown (cf. Mishnah Berakhot 1:1, Note 3). Therefore washing the hair is not necessary. Quoted Tosaphot Niddah 66b.. A menstruating priestly woman washes her hair and combs, not to differentiate between one menstruating woman and another. So also here, not to differentiate between elimination and elimination. Rabbi Gamliel bar Inyany stated before Rebbi Mana: A menstruating woman who interrupts for seven days washes her hair and combs. A priestly woman who immerses herself every day does not wash her hair and comb39From the comparison of the menstruating and the priestly women one cannot infer anything since the menstruating priestly woman is excluded from the common meal of sancta for the period of her impurity. The statement which exempts her from washing her hair applies only to pure priestly women.. He told him, it is necessary for one who watches one day for a day40As long as the rules of purity could be observed, a woman in the household of a Cohen was obligated to reduce the period of her impurity to a minimum. The method by which any other woman could avoid showing her blood to a rabbinic authority to ascertain the status of her impurity (cf. Niddah 4:1 Note 3) is not available to the priestly woman. It is rabbinic doctrine that after one menstruation, the next is possible only after 11 days.(Mishnah Niddah 4:7). If she loses blood on one of these days, she does not follow the rules of niddah but those of zavah. For the first two occurrences in one period she is impure only for 24 hours. The statement about the impure priestly woman is needed to decree that even an interruption of one day without immersion triggers the obligation of washing the hair..

Rebbi Yose asked: The courtyards in Jerusalem where one eats the bread of thanksgiving offerings34Which have an obligatory component of leavened bread, Lev. 7:13. and the wafers of a nazir35Part of the offering of the nazir at the fulfillment of his vow, Num. 6:15. These are unleavened., do they need checking? Are they not checked anyhow for leftovers36Since any leftovers from any well-being offering, including the thanksgiving offering, must be burned (Lev.7:17), every day of the year these localities are treated the way every other dwelling is treated on Passover Eve.? It should be parallel to what Rebbi Zachariah the son-in-law of Rebbi Levi stated: A menstruating woman washes her hair and combs37She becomes pure by immersing all her body in water. Therefore it is imperative that not two hairs cling together; before immersion she has to make sure that this does not happen.. A priestly woman does not wash her hair and comb38The wife, unmarried daughter, or slave of a Cohen who participate with the Cohen in eating heave and other sancta. As long as the rules of purity could be kept, these women, together with the Cohen, have to immerse themselves every day close to sundown (cf. Mishnah Berakhot 1:1, Note 3). Therefore washing the hair is not necessary. Quoted Tosaphot Niddah 66b.. A menstruating priestly woman washes her hair and combs, not to differentiate between one menstruating woman and another. So also here, not to differentiate between elimination and elimination. Rabbi Gamliel bar Inyany stated before Rebbi Mana: A menstruating woman who interrupts for seven days washes her hair and combs. A priestly woman who immerses herself every day does not wash her hair and comb39From the comparison of the menstruating and the priestly women one cannot infer anything since the menstruating priestly woman is excluded from the common meal of sancta for the period of her impurity. The statement which exempts her from washing her hair applies only to pure priestly women.. He told him, it is necessary for one who watches one day for a day40As long as the rules of purity could be observed, a woman in the household of a Cohen was obligated to reduce the period of her impurity to a minimum. The method by which any other woman could avoid showing her blood to a rabbinic authority to ascertain the status of her impurity (cf. Niddah 4:1 Note 3) is not available to the priestly woman. It is rabbinic doctrine that after one menstruation, the next is possible only after 11 days.(Mishnah Niddah 4:7). If she loses blood on one of these days, she does not follow the rules of niddah but those of zavah. For the first two occurrences in one period she is impure only for 24 hours. The statement about the impure priestly woman is needed to decree that even an interruption of one day without immersion triggers the obligation of washing the hair..

1:1:10

חוֹרֵי הַבָּיִת הָעֶלְיוֹנִים וְהַתַּחְתּוֹנִים וְהַיָּצִיעַ וְהַחַדּוּת וְהָעֲלִיָיה וְגַג הַבַּד וְגַג הַמִּגְדָּל בֵּית הַתֶּבֶן וּבֵית הַבָּקָר וּבֵית הָעֵצִים וּבֵית הָאוֹצָרוֹת אוֹצְרוֹת הַיַּיִן וְאוֹצְרוֹת הַשֶּׁמֶן וְאוֹצְרוֹת הַפֵּירוֹת אֵינָן צְרִיכִין בְּדִיקָה. נִיחָא הָעֶלְיוֹנִים. וְהַתַּחְתּוֹנִים. הָדָא אָמְרָה. לֹא חָשׁוּ לִנְפִילָה. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵה. תִּיפְתָּר שֶׁהָיוּ שְׁנֵיהֶן סְמוּכִין לַכּוֹתֶל. אֶחָד לְמַעֲלָה מֵעֲשָׂרָה וְאֶחָד לְמַטָּה מֵעֲשָׂרָה. וְהָא תַנִּינָן חַדּוּת. הָדָא אָמְרָה שֶׁלֹּא חָשׁוּ לִנְפִילָה. מִתְיָירֵא הוּא הַתִּינּוֹק לֵילֵךְ לְשָׁם. וְחָשׁ לוֹמַר. שֶׁמָּא נִתְגַּלְגֵּל חָמֵץ שָׁם. תִּיפְתָּר בְּחַדּוּת שֶׁיֵּשׁ לָהּ לִיזְבִּיז. וְגַג הַבַּד וְגַג הַמִּגְדָּל. הָדָא דְתֵימַר. בִּגְבוֹהִין שְׁלֹשָׁה טְפָחִים. אֲבָל אִם אֵינָן גְּבוֹהִין שְׁלֹשָׁה טְפָחִים כָּאָרֶץ הֵם. וּבְאוֹתוֹ שֶׁלֹּא נִשְׁתַּמֵּשׁ בּוֹ חָמֵץ. אֲבָל בְּאוֹתוֹ שֶׁנִּשְׁתַּמֵּשׁ בּוֹ חָמֵץ אֲפִילוּ גָבוֹהַּ כַּמָּה צָרִיךְ בְּדִיקָה. אָמַר רִבִּי מָנָא. וְיֵאוּת. כֵּן אֲנָן אָמְרִין. הָדָא פִיפְיָיארוֹת אֲפִילוּ גָבוֹהַּ כַּמָּה לֹא תְהֵא צָרִיכָה בְדִיקָה.

41Tosephta 1:3, Babli 8a.“Holes in the house, the upper and the lower ones, and the veranda42Any additional structure having a sloping roof., and the ditch43חדות is the same as דות in the Tosephta., and the upper floor44Used only for storage but not as dwelling., and the roof of the olive press45It seems that the reading of the Tosephta, גג הבית “the roof of the house” is the correct one (as it is quoted as reading of the Yerushalmi by R. Isaac Ibn Ghiat). A flat roof is exposed to the wind and to foraging birds; one may assume that no leavened matter stays there for long., and the roof of the tower46This has a sloping roof on which nothing stays., the storage room of straw, and the cattle stable, and the storage room of wood, and the storage room of provisions, wine storage, and oil storage, and produce storage, do not need checking.” One understands the upper ones47If “upper” means “higher than the reach of a person”, one need not expect that leavened matter was deposited there. But very low lying holes are at the reach of children.. The lower ones? Does this mean that they did not worry about things falling down? Rebbi Yose said, explain it if both were close to the wall48Holes at the outside of the wall., whether higher than ten or lower than ten [hand-breadths]49The text is confirmed by a quote in Tur Orah Hayyim §433; it does not make any sense since 10 hand-breadths is a height very accessible to all uses. The statement is rejected by all authorities who quote it.. Did we not state “the ditch”? Does this not mean that they did not worry about things falling down? The toddler is afraid to go there. But should one not be afraid that leavened matter rolled there? Explain it by a ditch which has a rim. “And the roof of the olive press, and the roof of the tower.” That is, if they are three hand-breadths high; but if they are not three hand-breadths high they are like ground. And if they were not used for leavened matter, but if they were used for leavened matter even if it is very high it needs checking. Rebbi Mana said, this is correct. Would we say that this papyrus scaffold which is very high should not need checking50Tosephta Šabbat 14(15):3 mentions an instrument used to remove bread from the papyrus scaffold where it is stored. Cf. Kilaim 6:3 Note 38.?

41Tosephta 1:3, Babli 8a.“Holes in the house, the upper and the lower ones, and the veranda42Any additional structure having a sloping roof., and the ditch43חדות is the same as דות in the Tosephta., and the upper floor44Used only for storage but not as dwelling., and the roof of the olive press45It seems that the reading of the Tosephta, גג הבית “the roof of the house” is the correct one (as it is quoted as reading of the Yerushalmi by R. Isaac Ibn Ghiat). A flat roof is exposed to the wind and to foraging birds; one may assume that no leavened matter stays there for long., and the roof of the tower46This has a sloping roof on which nothing stays., the storage room of straw, and the cattle stable, and the storage room of wood, and the storage room of provisions, wine storage, and oil storage, and produce storage, do not need checking.” One understands the upper ones47If “upper” means “higher than the reach of a person”, one need not expect that leavened matter was deposited there. But very low lying holes are at the reach of children.. The lower ones? Does this mean that they did not worry about things falling down? Rebbi Yose said, explain it if both were close to the wall48Holes at the outside of the wall., whether higher than ten or lower than ten [hand-breadths]49The text is confirmed by a quote in Tur Orah Hayyim §433; it does not make any sense since 10 hand-breadths is a height very accessible to all uses. The statement is rejected by all authorities who quote it.. Did we not state “the ditch”? Does this not mean that they did not worry about things falling down? The toddler is afraid to go there. But should one not be afraid that leavened matter rolled there? Explain it by a ditch which has a rim. “And the roof of the olive press, and the roof of the tower.” That is, if they are three hand-breadths high; but if they are not three hand-breadths high they are like ground. And if they were not used for leavened matter, but if they were used for leavened matter even if it is very high it needs checking. Rebbi Mana said, this is correct. Would we say that this papyrus scaffold which is very high should not need checking50Tosephta Šabbat 14(15):3 mentions an instrument used to remove bread from the papyrus scaffold where it is stored. Cf. Kilaim 6:3 Note 38.?

1:1:11

תַּנֵּי. רַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל אוֹמֵר. מִיטָּה שֶׁהִיא חוֹצֶצֶת בְּתוֹךְ הַבָּיִת וְעֵצִים וַאֲבָנִים מוּנָחִין תַּחְתֶּיהָ. בּוֹדֵק צַד הַחִיצוֹן וְאֵינוֹ בּוֹדֵק צַד הַפְּנִימִי. מִפְּנֵי שֶׁעֵצִים וַאֲבָנִים מוּנָחִין תַּחְתֶּיהָ. הָא אִם אֵין עֵצִים וַאֲבָנִים מוּנָחִין תַּחְתֶּיהָ צָרִיךְ לִבְדוֹק צַד הַפְּנִימִי. הָדָא אָמְרָה (שֶׁלֹּא) חָשׁוּ לִנְפִילָה. אֲנִי אוֹמֵר. תִּינּוֹק (יָגַע) [רַגָּע] וְהִכְנִיס שָׁם חָמֵץ.

It was stated: 41Tosephta 1:3, Babli 8a.“Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel says, a couch which was separated52The couch was separated from the floor, i. e., it was on high legs which left room for storage under the bed. in the house but wood and stones are stored under it, one checks at the outside but does not have to check on the inside.” Because wood and stones are stored under it, but if no wood and stones are stored under it, one has to check on the inside. Does this mean that they did (not)53The word was written by the scribe but correctly deleted by the corrector. worry about things falling down? I am saying that (a child exerted himself and) [an unruly child]53*Versions of (scribe) and [corrector.] brought leavened matter there54Just as the first part of the Tosephta, quoted in the preceding paragraph, does not prove that the earlier generations were not afraid of bread accidentally falling down without being picked up, so this part does not prove the opposite conclusion..

It was stated: 41Tosephta 1:3, Babli 8a.“Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel says, a couch which was separated52The couch was separated from the floor, i. e., it was on high legs which left room for storage under the bed. in the house but wood and stones are stored under it, one checks at the outside but does not have to check on the inside.” Because wood and stones are stored under it, but if no wood and stones are stored under it, one has to check on the inside. Does this mean that they did (not)53The word was written by the scribe but correctly deleted by the corrector. worry about things falling down? I am saying that (a child exerted himself and) [an unruly child]53*Versions of (scribe) and [corrector.] brought leavened matter there54Just as the first part of the Tosephta, quoted in the preceding paragraph, does not prove that the earlier generations were not afraid of bread accidentally falling down without being picked up, so this part does not prove the opposite conclusion..

1:1:12

מַרְתֵּף שֶׁלְיַיִן צָרִיךְ בְּדִיקָה. מַרְתֵּף שֶׁלְשֶׁמֶן אֵינוֹ צָרִיךְ בְּדִיקָה. מַה בֵין יַיִן וּמַה בֵין שֶׁמֶן. יַיִן אֵין לוֹ קֶבַע. שֶׁמֶן יֵשׁ לוֹ קֶבַע. אוֹצַר בֵּין שֶׁלְיַיִן בֵּין שֶׁלְשֶׁמֶן אֵינוֹ צָרִיךְ בְּדִיקָה. אֵיזֶהוּ מַרְתֵּף. כָּל שֶׁנָּתוּן עִם הַלֶּחֶם בֶּחָצֵר. יֵשׁ מַרְתֵּף שֶׁהוּא כְאוֹצָר וְאוֹצָר שֶׁהוּא כְמַרְתֵּף. מַרְתֵּף שֶׁהוּא בוֹשׁ לוֹכַל בְּתוֹכוֹ הֲרֵי הוּא כְאוֹצָר. וְאוֹצָר שֶׁאֵינוֹ בוֹשׁ לוֹכַל בְּתוֹכוֹ הֲרֵי הוּא כְמַרְתֵּף. יֵשׁ חָצֵר שֶׁהוּא כְמָבוֹי וּמָבוֹי שֶׁהוּא כְחָצֵר. חָצֵר שֶׁהָרַבִּים בּוֹקְעִין בְּתוֹכָהּ הֲרֵי הוּא כְמָבוֹי. וּמָבוֹי שֶׁאֵין הָרַבִּים בּוֹקְעִין בְּתוֹכוֹ הֲרֵי הוּא כְחָצֵר. וְחָשׁ לוֹמַר. שֶׁמָּא הַבְּהֵמִים מַכְנִיסִין לְתוֹכוֹ חָמֵץ. אֵין דֶּרֶךְ הַבְּהֵמִים לִהְיוֹת מַכְנִיסִין לְשָׁם חָמֵץ אֶלָּא מִינֵי מְתִיקָה. שֶׁהֵן בוֹדְקִין הַיַּיִן הַיָּפֶה.

A wine cellar needs checking, an oil cellar does not need checking55Babli 8a.. What is the difference between wine and oil? Wine has no staying power, oil has staying power56Wine is drawn from the amphora at least once a day; fresh oil is needed only from time to time.. Storage57Wholesale storage for commercial purposes., whether of wine or oil, does not need checking. What is a cellar? Anything used with bread in the courtyard58Any place where bread is introduced during the year needs checking. Some Medieval authors, e.g. Meïri (ed. J. Klein, Jerusalem 1964, p. 39, Notes 468–469) read here an additional sentence: “Storage is what is not used with bread in the courtyard.”. There exists a cellar which is like storage and storage which is like a cellar. A cellar in which he is ashamed to eat is like storage; storage where he is not ashamed to eat is like a cellar. 59This does not belong here; because of the similarity in language it is copied from Ketubot 7:7, Notes 71–72. There is a courtyard which is like an alley and an alley which is like a courtyard. A courtyard which is used by the public is like an alley, and an alley which is not used by the public is like a courtyard. But should one not be afraid that animal drivers introduce leavened matter into it60This refers back to storage areas. While the producer of the wine will not introduce bread into his storage area, what can be said about the teamster who will transport the wine for sale at other places?? Animal drivers usually do not introduce leavened matter into it but sweets since they help in checking the quality of the wine61If the teamster is transporting for his own account, he will want to check the quality of the wine he is buying; for that he eats taste enhancing candy, not taste dulling bread..

A wine cellar needs checking, an oil cellar does not need checking55Babli 8a.. What is the difference between wine and oil? Wine has no staying power, oil has staying power56Wine is drawn from the amphora at least once a day; fresh oil is needed only from time to time.. Storage57Wholesale storage for commercial purposes., whether of wine or oil, does not need checking. What is a cellar? Anything used with bread in the courtyard58Any place where bread is introduced during the year needs checking. Some Medieval authors, e.g. Meïri (ed. J. Klein, Jerusalem 1964, p. 39, Notes 468–469) read here an additional sentence: “Storage is what is not used with bread in the courtyard.”. There exists a cellar which is like storage and storage which is like a cellar. A cellar in which he is ashamed to eat is like storage; storage where he is not ashamed to eat is like a cellar. 59This does not belong here; because of the similarity in language it is copied from Ketubot 7:7, Notes 71–72. There is a courtyard which is like an alley and an alley which is like a courtyard. A courtyard which is used by the public is like an alley, and an alley which is not used by the public is like a courtyard. But should one not be afraid that animal drivers introduce leavened matter into it60This refers back to storage areas. While the producer of the wine will not introduce bread into his storage area, what can be said about the teamster who will transport the wine for sale at other places?? Animal drivers usually do not introduce leavened matter into it but sweets since they help in checking the quality of the wine61If the teamster is transporting for his own account, he will want to check the quality of the wine he is buying; for that he eats taste enhancing candy, not taste dulling bread..

1:1:13

הַיּוֹצֵא לְפָרֵשׂ קוֹדֶם שְׁלֹשִׁים יוֹם אֵינוֹ צָרִיךְ לִבְדוֹק. בְּתוֹךְ שְׁלֹשִׁים צָרִיךְ לִבְדוֹק. הָדָא דְתֵימַר בְּשֶׁיֵּשׁ בְּדַעְתּוֹ לַחֲזוֹר. אֲבָל אֵין בְּדַעְתּוֹ לַחֲזוֹר אֲפִילוּ קוֹדֶם לִשְׁלֹשִׁים יוֹם צָרִיךְ לִבְדוֹק. וּבְסָפֵק. אֲבָל בְּוַדַּאי אֲפִילוּ מֵרֹאשׁ הַשָּׁנָה. אָמַר רִבִּי בָּא. וַאֲפִילוּ יֵשׁ בְּדַעְתּוֹ לַחֲזוֹר צָרִיךְ לִבְדוֹק. שֶׁמָּא יִימָּלֵךְ וְלֹא יַחֲזוֹר.

“If somebody leaves to travel by sea, before thirty days he does not have to check; within thirty [days] he has to check”62Tosephta 1:4 (in the formulation of the Babli 6a).. 63The Babli 6a rules in everything the exact opposite of the Yerushalmi, which holds that everybody is obligated at all times to see to it that his property contains no leavened matter on Passover, wherever it be situated and wherever he spends the holiday. That is to say, if he intends to return. But if he does not intend to return, even before thirty days he has to check. If there is a doubt; but if it is certain then even from New Year’s Day. Rebbi Abba said, but even if he intends to return he has to check, maybe he will change his mind and not return.

“If somebody leaves to travel by sea, before thirty days he does not have to check; within thirty [days] he has to check”62Tosephta 1:4 (in the formulation of the Babli 6a).. 63The Babli 6a rules in everything the exact opposite of the Yerushalmi, which holds that everybody is obligated at all times to see to it that his property contains no leavened matter on Passover, wherever it be situated and wherever he spends the holiday. That is to say, if he intends to return. But if he does not intend to return, even before thirty days he has to check. If there is a doubt; but if it is certain then even from New Year’s Day. Rebbi Abba said, but even if he intends to return he has to check, maybe he will change his mind and not return.

1:1:14

הַכֹּל נֶאֱמָנִין עַל בִּיעוּר חָמֵץ. אֲפִילוּ נָשִׁים אֲפִילוּ עֲבָדִים. רִבִּי יִרְמְיָה בְשֵׁם רִבִּי זְעִירָה. לֵית כָּאן אֲפִילוּ נָשִׁים. נָשִׁים עַצְמָן הֵן נֶאֱמָנוֹת. מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהֵן עֲצֵילוֹת וְהֵן בּוֹדְקוֹת כָּל שֶׁהוּא כָּל שֶׁהוּא. כּוּתִים כָּל זְמַן שֶׁעוֹשִׂין מַצָּתָן עִם יִשְׂרָאֵל נֶאֱמָנִין הֵן עַל בִּיעוּר חָמֵץ. אִם אֵינָן עוֹשִׂין מַצָּתָן עִם יִשְׂרָאֵל אֵינָן נֶאֱמָנִים עַל בִּיעוּר חָמֵץ. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵה. הָדָא דְתֵימַר בַּבָּתִּים. אֲבָל בַּחֲצֵירוֹת חֲשׁוּדִין הֵן. דְּאִינּוּן דָּרְשִׁין לֹא יִמָּצֵא בְּבָתֵּיכֶם. לֹא בַחֲצֵרוֹתֵיכֶם.

Everybody is trustworthy about elimination of leavened matter, even women, even slaves. Rebbi Jeremiah in the name of Rebbi Ze`ira: There is no “even” women. Women intrinsically are trustworthy; since they are slow they check everything very carefully. Samaritans any time when they prepare their mazzah with Jews64If the Samaritan calendar has Passover on the same day as the rabbinic one. are trustworthy about checking for leavened matter; if they do not prepare their mazzah with Jews they are not trustworthy about checking for leavened matter. Rebbi Yose said, this means in the houses, but they are suspect in courtyards since they explain that it should not be found in your houses,65Ex. 12:19. does not apply to your courtyards.

Everybody is trustworthy about elimination of leavened matter, even women, even slaves. Rebbi Jeremiah in the name of Rebbi Ze`ira: There is no “even” women. Women intrinsically are trustworthy; since they are slow they check everything very carefully. Samaritans any time when they prepare their mazzah with Jews64If the Samaritan calendar has Passover on the same day as the rabbinic one. are trustworthy about checking for leavened matter; if they do not prepare their mazzah with Jews they are not trustworthy about checking for leavened matter. Rebbi Yose said, this means in the houses, but they are suspect in courtyards since they explain that it should not be found in your houses,65Ex. 12:19. does not apply to your courtyards.

1:1:15

תַּנֵּי. רַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל אוֹמֵר. כָּל מִצְוָה שֶׁהַכּוּתִים נוֹהֲגִין בָּהּ הֵם מְדַקְדְּקִין בָּהּ יֹתֵיר מִיִּשְׂרָאֵל. אֲמַר רִבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן. הָדָא דְתֵימַר בָּרִאשׁוֹנָה שֶׁהָיוּ מְשׁוּקָעִין בְּכוּפְרְנֵיהֶן. אֲבָל עַכְשָׁיו שֶׁאֵין לָהֶן לֹא מִצְוָה וְלֹא שְׁיֵרֵי מִצְוָה חֲשׁוּדִין הֵן וּמְקוּלְקָלִין הֵן.

It was stated: 66Tosephta 2:3, Babli Gittin 10a, Qiddushin 76a, Ḥulin 4a. Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel says, any commandment which the Samaritans keep they are much more exact with them than Jews. Rebbi Simeon67This author cannot be R. Simeon ben Yoḥai, but he might be R. Simeon ben Eleazar (Avodah zarah 5:4, p. 447). said, that means earlier when they were concentrated in their villages. But today, when they have no commandments nor remainders of commandments they are suspect and degenerate.

It was stated: 66Tosephta 2:3, Babli Gittin 10a, Qiddushin 76a, Ḥulin 4a. Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel says, any commandment which the Samaritans keep they are much more exact with them than Jews. Rebbi Simeon67This author cannot be R. Simeon ben Yoḥai, but he might be R. Simeon ben Eleazar (Avodah zarah 5:4, p. 447). said, that means earlier when they were concentrated in their villages. But today, when they have no commandments nor remainders of commandments they are suspect and degenerate.

1:1:16

שׁוֹאֲלִין בְּהִילְכוֹת הַפֶּסַח בְּפֶסַח. הִילְכוֹת עֲצֶרֶת בָּעֲצֶרֶת. הִילְכוֹת חַג בְּחַג. בְּבֵית וַועַד שׁוֹאֲלִין קוֹדֶם לִשְׁלֹשִׁים יוֹם. רַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל אוֹמֵר. שְׁתֵּי שַׁבָּתוֹת. אַתְיָיא דְרִבִּי יוֹחָנָן כְּרַבָּנִין. וְדַחֲבֵרַיָיא כְרַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. טַעֲמוֹן דְּרַבָּנִין. שֶׁכֵּן מֹשֶׁה עוֹמֵד בַּפֶּסַח רִאשׁוֹן וְאוֹמֵר לָהֶן הִילְכוֹת הַפֶּסַח הַשֵּׁינִי. וְדַחֲבֵרַיָיא כְרַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל. שֶׁכֵּן מֹשֶׁה עוֹמֵד בַּרֹאשׁ חוֹדֶשׁ וְאוֹמֵר לָהֶם הִילְכוֹת הַפֶּסַח.

One asks about practices of Passover at Passover, practices of Pentecost at Pentecost, practices of Tabernacles at Tabernacles68Babli Megillah 4a. Sifry Num. 66.. In the House of Assembly one asks thirty days in advance; Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel says, two weeks69Babli Pesaḥim 6a.. The statement of Rebbi Joḥanan follows the rabbis, that of the colleagues Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel. Rebbi Joḥanan said, the reason of the rabbis, because Moses stands on the First Passover and explains to them the rules of Second Passover70The rules of the Second Passover to be celebrated on the 14th of Iyar by people impure on the 14th of Nisan were promulgated on the 13th of Nisan, Num.9:9–14.. That of the colleagues follows Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel, because Moses stands on the day of the New Moon and explains to them the rules of Passover71Num. 9:1–4..

One asks about practices of Passover at Passover, practices of Pentecost at Pentecost, practices of Tabernacles at Tabernacles68Babli Megillah 4a. Sifry Num. 66.. In the House of Assembly one asks thirty days in advance; Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel says, two weeks69Babli Pesaḥim 6a.. The statement of Rebbi Joḥanan follows the rabbis, that of the colleagues Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel. Rebbi Joḥanan said, the reason of the rabbis, because Moses stands on the First Passover and explains to them the rules of Second Passover70The rules of the Second Passover to be celebrated on the 14th of Iyar by people impure on the 14th of Nisan were promulgated on the 13th of Nisan, Num.9:9–14.. That of the colleagues follows Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel, because Moses stands on the day of the New Moon and explains to them the rules of Passover71Num. 9:1–4..

1:1:17

כְּמָה אָמְרוּ שְׁתֵּי שׁוּרוֹת בַּמַּרְתֵּף וכו׳. רַב חוּנָה בְשֵׁם רַב. קוֹלְפוֹ כְמִין גַּם. תַּנֵּי בַּר קַפָּרָא. קוֹלְפוֹ כְמִין שְׁנֵי גַּמִּין. הָיָה נָתוּן בְּאֶמְצַע הַבַּיִת. עַל דַּעְתֵּיהּ דְּרַב חוּנָא מַפְשִׁיטוֹ חָלוּק אֶחָד. עַל דַּעְתֵּיהּ דְּבַר קַפָּרָא מַפְשִׁיטוֹ שְׂנֵי חֲלָקוֹת. הָיָה עָשׂוּי מַדְרֵיגוֹת מַדְרֵיגוֹת. קוֹלְפוֹ גַּמִּים גַּמִּים. רִבִּי יַעֲקֹב בַּר אָחָא בְשֵׁם חִזְקִיָּה. שִׁמְעוֹן בַּר בָּא בְשֵׁם רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. שׁוּרָה הַחִיצוֹנָה הִיא הָעֶלְיוֹנָה הָרוֹאָה אֶת הַפֶּתַח וְאֶת הַקּוֹרָה. שֶׁלִּפְנִים מִמֶּנָּה. תַּנֵּי. שֶׁלְּמַטָּה מִמֶּנָּה. הֲווֹן בָּעֵיי מֵימַר. מָאן דְּאָמַר. שֶׁלִּפְנִים הִימֶּינָּה. כָּל שֶׁכֵּן שֶׁלְּמַטָּה הִימֶּינָּה. מָאן דָּמַר. שֶׁלְּמַטָּה הִימֶּינָּה. הָא לִפְנִים הִימֶּינָּה לֹא. נִשְׁתַּמֵּשׁ בַּחֲצִי שׁוּרָה. פְּשִׁיטָא. אוֹתָהּ שֶׁנִּשְׁתַּמֵּשׁ יֵשׁ לָהּ שֶׁלִּפְנִים מִמֶּנָּה וְשֶׁלְּמַטָּה מִמֶּנָּה. אוֹתָהּ שֶׁלֹּא נִשְׁתַּמֵּשׁ בָּהּ יֵשׁ לָהּ שֶׁלִּפְנִים מִמֶּנָּה וְשֶׁלְּמַטָּה מִמֶּנָּה. הָדָא דְתֵימַר. בִּמְחוֹלְלוֹת. אֲבָל בָּאֲפוּצוֹת מַעֲבִיר עֲלֵיהֶן אֶת [הַנֵּר וְדַיוֹ.] הָדָא אָמְרָה שֶׁחָשׁוּ לִנְפִילָה. אָמַר רִבִּי פִינְחָס דְּיָפוֹ. אֲנִי אוֹמֵר. בְּשָׁעָה שֶׁסִּידְרָן הִכְנִיס שָׁם חָמֵץ.

“Where1The Babli and Maimonides read ולמה “why” instead of ובמה “where”. did they say two rows in the cellar2The storage place for wine or oil amphoras. While this is not a place where one usually stores leavened matter it is possible that the person who is asked to bring a barrel of wine or oil for household use is eating some bread and deposits it temporarily near the entrance door. Therefore it needs checking except for a wholesaler’s cellar.,” etc. Rav Huna in the name of Rav: He peels it like a Gamma. Bar Qappara stated, he peels it like two Gamma73He checks the outer rows in the cellar in two directions orthogonal to one another, in the shape of Ã. Babli 8b in the name of R. Joḥanan.. If it was situated in the middle of the room. In the opinion of Rav Huna he strips it of one garment, in the opinion of Bar Qappara he strips it of two garments74He has to check the lower row and one vertical row and the upper row and, depending on the interpretation given later, either another vertical row or a horizontal row inwards.. If it75The storage room. Each step defines a new front row. was built in steps, he strips it by many Gamma. Rebbi Jacob bar Aḥa in the name of Ḥizqiah: Simeon bar Abba in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan. The outermost row which is the uppermost which sees both door and beam of the roof, [and] the one inside of it76If the amphoras are stored at least two layers high, one has to check the two rows close to the entrance of the top layer.. It was stated: the one below it. They wanted to say that he who says, the one inside of it, so much more that one below it. He who says, the one below it, therefore not the one inside of it77Only the front rows in all layers have to be checked.. If half a row was used, it is obvious that what was used has inside of it and below it. That which was not used has inside of it and below it78Even if during the year wine was taken only from one side of one row, once part of a row must be checked, the entire row must be checked.. That is to say, if they are spaced79According to Tosephta Ahilut 10:5, amphoras are spaced if on two opposite sides there is one hand-breadth of free space.. But if they are tightly packed he passes the light over them80Corrector’s text. The scribe’s הנייר ולווי “the paper and appurtenances” is unintelligible. and it is enough. Does this mean that they did worry about things falling down? Rebbi Phineas from Yafo80*Nothing more is known about him. said, I am saying that the servant introduced leavened matter when he placed them.

“Where1The Babli and Maimonides read ולמה “why” instead of ובמה “where”. did they say two rows in the cellar2The storage place for wine or oil amphoras. While this is not a place where one usually stores leavened matter it is possible that the person who is asked to bring a barrel of wine or oil for household use is eating some bread and deposits it temporarily near the entrance door. Therefore it needs checking except for a wholesaler’s cellar.,” etc. Rav Huna in the name of Rav: He peels it like a Gamma. Bar Qappara stated, he peels it like two Gamma73He checks the outer rows in the cellar in two directions orthogonal to one another, in the shape of Ã. Babli 8b in the name of R. Joḥanan.. If it was situated in the middle of the room. In the opinion of Rav Huna he strips it of one garment, in the opinion of Bar Qappara he strips it of two garments74He has to check the lower row and one vertical row and the upper row and, depending on the interpretation given later, either another vertical row or a horizontal row inwards.. If it75The storage room. Each step defines a new front row. was built in steps, he strips it by many Gamma. Rebbi Jacob bar Aḥa in the name of Ḥizqiah: Simeon bar Abba in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan. The outermost row which is the uppermost which sees both door and beam of the roof, [and] the one inside of it76If the amphoras are stored at least two layers high, one has to check the two rows close to the entrance of the top layer.. It was stated: the one below it. They wanted to say that he who says, the one inside of it, so much more that one below it. He who says, the one below it, therefore not the one inside of it77Only the front rows in all layers have to be checked.. If half a row was used, it is obvious that what was used has inside of it and below it. That which was not used has inside of it and below it78Even if during the year wine was taken only from one side of one row, once part of a row must be checked, the entire row must be checked.. That is to say, if they are spaced79According to Tosephta Ahilut 10:5, amphoras are spaced if on two opposite sides there is one hand-breadth of free space.. But if they are tightly packed he passes the light over them80Corrector’s text. The scribe’s הנייר ולווי “the paper and appurtenances” is unintelligible. and it is enough. Does this mean that they did worry about things falling down? Rebbi Phineas from Yafo80*Nothing more is known about him. said, I am saying that the servant introduced leavened matter when he placed them.

Texts

  • Hebrew: The Jerusalem Talmud, edition by Heinrich W. Guggenheimer. Berlin, De Gruyter, 1999-2015 · License: CC-BY
  • English: The Jerusalem Talmud, translation and commentary by Heinrich W. Guggenheimer. Berlin, De Gruyter, 1999-2015 · License: CC-BY

Where next