Talmud Yerushalmi
Yerushalmi Pesachim 10:7 ירושלמי פסחים י׳:ז׳
Part of: Chapter 10
Reading: Hebrew · Simple EnglishHebrew · Faithful translationHebrew onlyHebrew · Simple EnglishHebrew · Faithful translationHebrew onlySimple English onlyFaithful translation onlySide by side
משנה: יָשְׁנוּ מִקְצָתָן יֹאכֵלוּ. כּוּלָּם לֹא יֹאכֵלוּ. רִבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר אִם נִתְנַמְנְמוּ יֹאכֵלוּ. נִרְדְּמוּ לֹא יֹאכֵלוּ: הַפֶּסַח אַחַר חֲצוֹת מְטַמֵּא אֶת הַיָּדָיִם. הַפִּיגּוּל וְהַנּוֹתָר מְטַמְּאִין אֶת הַיָּדָיִם. בֵּירַךְ בִּרְכַּת הַפֶּסַח פָּטַר אֶת שֶׁל זֶבַח. בֵּרַךְ אֶת שֶׁל זֶבַח לֹא פָטַר אֶת שֶׁל פֶּסַח דִּבְרֵי רִבִּי יִשְׁמָעֵאל. רִבִּי עֲקִיבָה אוֹמֵר לֹא זוֹ פוֹטֶרֶת זוֹ וְלֹא זוֹ פוֹטֶרֶת זוֹ:
MISHNAH: If part of them slept, they may eat; if all of them, they may not eat106Sacrifices become disqualified if they are not permanently guarded. If the entire company sleeps before the Pesaḥ is consumed, the meat automatically is disqualified and impure. Rebbi Yose says, if they107The entire company subscribing to one Pesaḥ. were sleepy, they may eat, if they slept they may not eat. The Pesaḥ after midnight110When rabbinically it may no longer be eaten (Mishnah Zevaḥim 5:8), it is treated as leftover. makes hands impure. Piggul111A sacrifice slaughtered with the intention of consuming it after its allotted time or at an unauthorized place. While it is a deadly sin to consume piggul, the impurity imposed on it is purely rabbinical and weaker than biblical impurity. and leftover112A qualified sacrifice left after the time allotted to its consumption. make the hands impure. If he recited the benediction for the Pesaḥ113“Praise to You, Eternal, our God, King of the universe, Who sanctified us by His commandments and commanded us to eat Pesaḥ” (Tosephta 10:13). it exempted that of the family sacrifice114“Praise to You, Eternal, our God, King of the universe, Who sanctified us by His commandments and commanded us to eat sacrifice.” For R. Ismael, the Pesaḥ is the main dish, the family sacrifice is a filler and does not need a separate benediction (Mishnah Berakhot 6:7). For R. Aqiba the two are coordinate, neither is subordinate to the other.; the one for the family sacrifice does not exempt the one for the Pesaḥ, the words of Rebbi Ismael. Rebbi Aqiba said, neither one exempts the other.
MISHNAH: If part of them slept, they may eat; if all of them, they may not eat106Sacrifices become disqualified if they are not permanently guarded. If the entire company sleeps before the Pesaḥ is consumed, the meat automatically is disqualified and impure. Rebbi Yose says, if they107The entire company subscribing to one Pesaḥ. were sleepy, they may eat, if they slept they may not eat. The Pesaḥ after midnight110When rabbinically it may no longer be eaten (Mishnah Zevaḥim 5:8), it is treated as leftover. makes hands impure. Piggul111A sacrifice slaughtered with the intention of consuming it after its allotted time or at an unauthorized place. While it is a deadly sin to consume piggul, the impurity imposed on it is purely rabbinical and weaker than biblical impurity. and leftover112A qualified sacrifice left after the time allotted to its consumption. make the hands impure. If he recited the benediction for the Pesaḥ113“Praise to You, Eternal, our God, King of the universe, Who sanctified us by His commandments and commanded us to eat Pesaḥ” (Tosephta 10:13). it exempted that of the family sacrifice114“Praise to You, Eternal, our God, King of the universe, Who sanctified us by His commandments and commanded us to eat sacrifice.” For R. Ismael, the Pesaḥ is the main dish, the family sacrifice is a filler and does not need a separate benediction (Mishnah Berakhot 6:7). For R. Aqiba the two are coordinate, neither is subordinate to the other.; the one for the family sacrifice does not exempt the one for the Pesaḥ, the words of Rebbi Ismael. Rebbi Aqiba said, neither one exempts the other.
הלכה: לָמָּה. מִפְּנֵי הִסִּיעַ דַּעַת אוֹ מִשֵּׁם שֶׁעָבַר עָלָיו חַצּוֹת. הַגַּע עַצְמָךְ שֶׁיֵּשׁ שָׁם חֲבוּרָה אֲחֶרֶת. הֲרֵי לֹא עָבַר חַצּוֹת. הֲוֵי. לֵית טַעֲמָא דָא אֶלָּא מִפְּנֵי הִסִּיעַ דַּעַת.
HALAKHAH: Why? Because they did not think of it or because midnight had passed? Think of it, if there was another group and midnight had not passed? Therefore the reason only is because they did not think of it115It seems that this paragraph does not refer to Mishnah 9 but to Mishnah 8. Why is the Pesaḥ disqualified if the participants were sleeping? Is it rabbinically, for they may miss the deadline of midnight, or biblically because nobody guards the sacrifice? Since the Mishnah implies that the Pesaḥ is disqualified even if there is another group in the house which would see to it that the first group would not miss the deadline, it follows that the reason must be the lack of attention given to the Pesaḥ..
HALAKHAH: Why? Because they did not think of it or because midnight had passed? Think of it, if there was another group and midnight had not passed? Therefore the reason only is because they did not think of it115It seems that this paragraph does not refer to Mishnah 9 but to Mishnah 8. Why is the Pesaḥ disqualified if the participants were sleeping? Is it rabbinically, for they may miss the deadline of midnight, or biblically because nobody guards the sacrifice? Since the Mishnah implies that the Pesaḥ is disqualified even if there is another group in the house which would see to it that the first group would not miss the deadline, it follows that the reason must be the lack of attention given to the Pesaḥ..
רִבִּי סִימוֹן בְּשֵׁם רִבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ בֶּן לֵוִי. הַפִּיגּוּל וְהַנּוֹתָר מִצְטָרְפִין לְטַמֵּא אֶת הַיָּדַיִם כְּדֵי עוֹנְשָׁן בַּכְּזַיִת. מַהוּ שֶׁיִּפְסוֹל אֶת הַתְּרוּמָה. קַל וָחוֹמֶר. אִם מְטַמִּין אֶת הַיָּדַיִם לִפְסוֹל אֶת הַתְּרוּמָה. הֵן עַצְמָן לֹא כָל שֶׁכֵּן. הָהֵן יוֹצֵא מָה אַתְּ עֲבַד לֵיהּ. מְטַמֵּא אֶת הַיָּדַיִם אוֹ אֵינוֹ מְטַמֵּא אֶת הַיָּדַיִם. אִין תֵּימַר הָהֵן יוֹצֵא מְטַמֵּא אֶת הַיָּדַיִם. הַפִּיגּוּל וְהַנּוֹתָר אֵינָן פּוֹסְלִין אֶת הַתְּרוּמָה. וְהָהֵן יוֹצֵא לֹא גָזְרוּ עָלָיו כְּלוּם. דִּלֹ כֵן יְטַמֵּא צַד הַחִיצוֹן וְצַד הַפְּנִימִי. [אָמַר רִבִּי אַבִּין. מָאן אִית לֵיהּ דָּבָר טָמֵא מַחְמַת מַגַּע עַצְמוֹ. לֹא רִבִּי מֵאִיר. וְלֹא כֵן אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. כָּל הַדְּבָרִים טְהוֹרִים בְּרוּבָּן. כֵּיוָן שֶׁחִיתֵּךְ רוּבָּן לָאו כְפָרוּשׁ הוּא. וְיֵעָשֶׂה כְמַגִּיעַ בּוֹ וִיהֵא פָסוּל.] אָמַר רִבִּי חֲנַנְיָה. בִּמְחַתֵּךְ כָּל שֶׁהוּא כָּל שֶׁהוּא וּמַשְׁלִיךְ.
116This paragraph is copied from Halakhah 7:11, Notes 300–309. Rebbi Simon in the name of Rebbi Joshua ben Levi: Piggul and leftovers add together to make hands impure in the amount that exposes to punishment, the volume of an olive. Do they disqualify heave? It is a argument de minore ad maius. If they make hands impure to disqualify heave, they themselves not so much more? This which was left, what are you doing with it? Does it make hands impure or does it not make hands impure? If you are saying that this which was left makes hands impure, would piggul and leftovers not disqualify heave? About that which was left they did not decide anything4Babli 99b, Tosephta Berakhot 5:1. The Babli denies that in the special case of Passover Eve R. Yose disagrees.. For if it were not so, the outer part would make the inner part impure5Babli 100a.. Rebbi Abbin said, who holds that something can become impure by touching itself? Rebbi Meïr. Did not Rebbi Joḥanan say, everything becomes pure by its greater part? When he cut off the greater part, is it not separated? Then it would be touching and be disqualified. Rebbi Ḥananiah said, if he cuts off minimal pieces and throws away.
116This paragraph is copied from Halakhah 7:11, Notes 300–309. Rebbi Simon in the name of Rebbi Joshua ben Levi: Piggul and leftovers add together to make hands impure in the amount that exposes to punishment, the volume of an olive. Do they disqualify heave? It is a argument de minore ad maius. If they make hands impure to disqualify heave, they themselves not so much more? This which was left, what are you doing with it? Does it make hands impure or does it not make hands impure? If you are saying that this which was left makes hands impure, would piggul and leftovers not disqualify heave? About that which was left they did not decide anything4Babli 99b, Tosephta Berakhot 5:1. The Babli denies that in the special case of Passover Eve R. Yose disagrees.. For if it were not so, the outer part would make the inner part impure5Babli 100a.. Rebbi Abbin said, who holds that something can become impure by touching itself? Rebbi Meïr. Did not Rebbi Joḥanan say, everything becomes pure by its greater part? When he cut off the greater part, is it not separated? Then it would be touching and be disqualified. Rebbi Ḥananiah said, if he cuts off minimal pieces and throws away.
אִית לָךְ מֵימַר. שֶׁעָבַר חַצּוֹת. לָא מִפְּנֵי הִסִּיעַ דַּעַת. הֲוֵיי. לֵית טַעֲמָא (דְלָא) [אֶלָּא] מִפְּנֵי הִסִּיעַ דַּעַת.
Can you say, because midnight has passed? No, because they did not think of it. Therefore the reason only is because they did not think of it117Since the preceding paragraph is about the Pesaḥ taken out from its place, long before midnight, it follows that also in that case it is disqualified and makes hands impure because one no longer guards it..
Can you say, because midnight has passed? No, because they did not think of it. Therefore the reason only is because they did not think of it117Since the preceding paragraph is about the Pesaḥ taken out from its place, long before midnight, it follows that also in that case it is disqualified and makes hands impure because one no longer guards it..
אָמַר רִבִּי זְעוּרָה. דְּלֹא בֵירַךְ בִּרְכַת הַפֶּסַח לֹא פָטַר שֶׁלְזֶבַח. וְשֶׁלְזֶבַח פָּטַר שֶׁלְפֶּסַח. שֶׁהַפֶּסַח בִּכְלָל הַזֶּבַח. אָמַר רִבִּי מָנָא. הַפֶּסַח עִיקָּר וְהַזֶּבַח טְפֵילָה.
Rebbi Zeˋira said, should not making the benediction for Pesaḥ not exempt the sacrifice, but for the sacrifice exempt the Pesaḥ, since the Pesaḥ is included in the notion of sacrifice118Since the formulation of the benediction for the festival sacrifice is general, and making a general benediction in general makes it impossible to recite the more appropriate specific benediction (Mishnah Berakhot 6:2), one can understand the position neither of R. Ismael nor that of R. Aqiba.? Rebbi Mana said, the Pesaḥ is the main item, the {family} sacrifice a minor part119The principle of Mishnah Berakhot6:2 is not applicable here for either R. Ismael or R. Aqiba..
Rebbi Zeˋira said, should not making the benediction for Pesaḥ not exempt the sacrifice, but for the sacrifice exempt the Pesaḥ, since the Pesaḥ is included in the notion of sacrifice118Since the formulation of the benediction for the festival sacrifice is general, and making a general benediction in general makes it impossible to recite the more appropriate specific benediction (Mishnah Berakhot 6:2), one can understand the position neither of R. Ismael nor that of R. Aqiba.? Rebbi Mana said, the Pesaḥ is the main item, the {family} sacrifice a minor part119The principle of Mishnah Berakhot6:2 is not applicable here for either R. Ismael or R. Aqiba..