Reading: Hebrew · Simple EnglishHebrew · Faithful translationHebrew onlyHebrew · Simple EnglishHebrew · Faithful translationHebrew onlySimple English onlyFaithful translation onlySide by side

8:4:1

משנה: נָפְלוּ לָהּ כְּסָפִים יִלָּקַח בָּהֶן קַרְקַע וְהוּא אוֹכֵל פֵּירוֹת. פֵּירוֹת הַתְּלוּשִׁין מִן הַקַּרְקַע יִלָּקַח בָּהֶן קַרְקַע וְהוּא אוֹכֵל פֵּירוֹת. פֵּירוֹת הַמְחוּבָּרִין אָמַר רִבִּי מֵאִיר שָׁמִין אוֹתָן כַּמָּה הֵן יָפִין בַּפֵּירוֹת וְכַמָּה הֵן יָפִין בְּלֹא פֵירוֹת וּמוֹתָר יִלָּקַח בָּהֶן קַרְקַע וְהוּא אוֹכֵל פֵּירוֹת. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים הַמְחוּבָּרִין לַקַּרְקַע שֶׁלּוֹ וְהַתְּלוּשִׁין מִן הַקַּרְקַע שֶׁלָּהּ וְיִלָּקַח בָּהֶן קַרְקַע וְהוּא אוֹכֵל פֵּירוֹת.

MISHNAH: If she inherited money; real estate should be bought26Since it is the husband’s duty to preserve his wife’s property. In the economic environment of the later Roman Empire, real estate was the only investment guaranteed to keep its value (investments appropriate for the guardian of widows and orphans). Simce the husband is required to pay for all her needs, she has no direct use for the cash she inherited. with it and he eats its yield. For produce cut from the ground, real estate should be bought and he eats its yield; with produce connected to the ground, Rebbi Meïr says one has to estimate how much the property27The field in which the crop is standing. is worth with produce and how much without, for the difference real estate should be bought28Since R. Meïr holds that a crop is yield only if it grew under his care. and he eats its yield. But the Sages say, standing produce is his29Since it is yield., cut it is hers; real estate should be bought from it and he eats its yield.

MISHNAH: If she inherited money; real estate should be bought26Since it is the husband’s duty to preserve his wife’s property. In the economic environment of the later Roman Empire, real estate was the only investment guaranteed to keep its value (investments appropriate for the guardian of widows and orphans). Simce the husband is required to pay for all her needs, she has no direct use for the cash she inherited. with it and he eats its yield. For produce cut from the ground, real estate should be bought and he eats its yield; with produce connected to the ground, Rebbi Meïr says one has to estimate how much the property27The field in which the crop is standing. is worth with produce and how much without, for the difference real estate should be bought28Since R. Meïr holds that a crop is yield only if it grew under his care. and he eats its yield. But the Sages say, standing produce is his29Since it is yield., cut it is hers; real estate should be bought from it and he eats its yield.

8:4:2

הלכה: נָפְלוּ לָהּ כְּסָפִים יִלָּקַח בָּהֶן קַרְקַע כול׳. אָמַר רִבִּי יִרְמְיָה. דְרִבִּי מֵאִיר הִיא. דְּרִבִּי מֵאִיר עֲבַד מְחוּבָּרִין כִּתְלוּשִׁין. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵי. וְלֹא שְׁמִיעַ דָּמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֶי בֶּן חְנִינָה. לֹא אָמַר רִבִּי מֵאִיר אֶלָּא בְקָמָה הָעוֹמֶדֶת לְהִיקָּצֵר וּגְפָנִים עוֹמְדוֹת להִיבָּצֵר. הָא שַׁחַת לֹא. בְּרַם הָכָא אֲפִילוּ שַׁחַת. רִבִּי יִרְמְיָה בְעָא. מִחְלְפָא שִׁיטָּתֵיהּ דְּרִבִּי מֵאִיר. תַּמָּן לָא עֲבַד מְחוּבָּרִין כִּתְלוּשִׁין וְהָכָא עֲבַד מְחוּבָּרִין כִּתְלוּשִׁין. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. לֹא דְּרִבִּי מֵאִיר עֲבַד מְחוּבָּרִין כִּתְלוּשִׁין. אֵלָּא אִם אַתָּה רוֹאֶה קָמָה קְצוּרָה אַתְּ מְיַיפֶּה כּוֹחָהּ שֶׁל אִשָּׁה. שָׂדֶה שֶׁלֹּא נִזְרְעָה אַתְּ מְיַיפֶּה כּוֹחוֹ שֶׁלָּאִישׁ. מִסָּפֵק שָׁמִין אוֹתָהּ כָּמָּה הָיְתָה יָפָה עַד שֶׁלֹּא נִזְרְעָה וְכַמָּה הִיא יָפָה מִשֶּׁנִּזְרְעָה. עַד שֶׁלֹּא נִזְרְעָה הִיא טָבָה תְּרֵין דֵּינָרִין. מִשֶּׁנִּזְרְעָה הִיא יָפָה חַד דֵּינָר. אוֹתוֹ הַדֵּינָר יִלָּקַח בּוֹ קַרְקַע וְהוּא אוֹכֵל פֵּירוֹת.

HALAKHAH: “If she inherited money; real estate should be bought,” etc. Rebbi Jeremiah said, this is Rebbi Meïr’s opinion since Rebbi Meïr considers standing [produce] as if it were cut30This refers to Mishnah Ševuot 6:6. In rabbinic interpretation, Ex. 22:8 defines when an oath is required by the court: “About any criminal matter, about an ox, a donkey, a sheep, a garment, or anything lost, if he agrees that this is it, the suit shall be heard by the judges …” This is read to mean that an oath is needed if the defendant agrees that the plaintiff has a case but that he owes less than what is being claimed (cf. Mekhilta dR. Ismael, Mišpaṭim 15). The part of the claim in dispute is what the claimant considers criminal withholding of his property by the defendant. If the defendant rejects the entire claim, the claimant has to prove his case by witnesses or documents; if the defendant admits part of the claim the claimant can request that he swear not to owe more. But since the examples given in the verse are all about movables, it is concluded that claims of real estate cannot be resolved by an oath (Mishnah Ševuot6:5). On that, R. Meïr states that “some things are on the ground but are not real estate”. The example given is that the claim is “I handed over to you (to harvest and make wine from) ten vines full of fruit” but the defendant claims “there were ony five.” In that case, R. Meïr requires the defendant to swear but the Sages hold that anything connected to the ground is like real estate.
Since the produce on the field is considered as the wife’s capital, not the husband’s produce, R. Jeremiah infers that the Mishnah does not represent practice since it follows R. Meïr in a case in which the majority disagrees.
. Rebbi Yose said, he did not hear that Rebbi Yose ben Ḥanina said, Rebbi Meïr said this only for standing grain ready to be harvested and grapes ready to be harvested; therefore not unripe produce31Cf. Yebamot 15:3, Note 79; Babli Ševuot 43a.. But here32The case of the wife’s inheritance is not restricted to ripe produce., even unripe produce. Rebbi Jeremiah33This attribution is impossible. Rebbi Jeremiah cannot ask a question answered by his teacher’s teacher’s teacher R. Joḥanan. It might be Rav Jeremiah, one generation before R. Joḥanan. asked, are not the arguments of Rebbi Meïr contradictory? There34In Mishnah Ševuot 6:6., he did not consider standing [produce] as if it were cut, but here32The case of the wife’s inheritance is not restricted to ripe produce. he considers standing [produce] as if it were cut. Rebbi Joḥanan said, Rebbi Meïr does not consider standing [produce] as if it were cut. But if you see cut grain, you empower the woman35Cut grain is as good as coin for an inheritance.; if you see an unseeded field36This has to be tended; the husband will reap the fruits., you empower the man. In case of doubt you estimate how much it is worth unseeded and how much seeded. If before it was seeded it was worth (two denars)37Obviously, the numbers have to be switched since 1 < 2. and when it was seeded (one denar), with that denar real estate should be bought and he reaps its yield.

HALAKHAH: “If she inherited money; real estate should be bought,” etc. Rebbi Jeremiah said, this is Rebbi Meïr’s opinion since Rebbi Meïr considers standing [produce] as if it were cut30This refers to Mishnah Ševuot 6:6. In rabbinic interpretation, Ex. 22:8 defines when an oath is required by the court: “About any criminal matter, about an ox, a donkey, a sheep, a garment, or anything lost, if he agrees that this is it, the suit shall be heard by the judges …” This is read to mean that an oath is needed if the defendant agrees that the plaintiff has a case but that he owes less than what is being claimed (cf. Mekhilta dR. Ismael, Mišpaṭim 15). The part of the claim in dispute is what the claimant considers criminal withholding of his property by the defendant. If the defendant rejects the entire claim, the claimant has to prove his case by witnesses or documents; if the defendant admits part of the claim the claimant can request that he swear not to owe more. But since the examples given in the verse are all about movables, it is concluded that claims of real estate cannot be resolved by an oath (Mishnah Ševuot6:5). On that, R. Meïr states that “some things are on the ground but are not real estate”. The example given is that the claim is “I handed over to you (to harvest and make wine from) ten vines full of fruit” but the defendant claims “there were ony five.” In that case, R. Meïr requires the defendant to swear but the Sages hold that anything connected to the ground is like real estate.
Since the produce on the field is considered as the wife’s capital, not the husband’s produce, R. Jeremiah infers that the Mishnah does not represent practice since it follows R. Meïr in a case in which the majority disagrees.
. Rebbi Yose said, he did not hear that Rebbi Yose ben Ḥanina said, Rebbi Meïr said this only for standing grain ready to be harvested and grapes ready to be harvested; therefore not unripe produce31Cf. Yebamot 15:3, Note 79; Babli Ševuot 43a.. But here32The case of the wife’s inheritance is not restricted to ripe produce., even unripe produce. Rebbi Jeremiah33This attribution is impossible. Rebbi Jeremiah cannot ask a question answered by his teacher’s teacher’s teacher R. Joḥanan. It might be Rav Jeremiah, one generation before R. Joḥanan. asked, are not the arguments of Rebbi Meïr contradictory? There34In Mishnah Ševuot 6:6., he did not consider standing [produce] as if it were cut, but here32The case of the wife’s inheritance is not restricted to ripe produce. he considers standing [produce] as if it were cut. Rebbi Joḥanan said, Rebbi Meïr does not consider standing [produce] as if it were cut. But if you see cut grain, you empower the woman35Cut grain is as good as coin for an inheritance.; if you see an unseeded field36This has to be tended; the husband will reap the fruits., you empower the man. In case of doubt you estimate how much it is worth unseeded and how much seeded. If before it was seeded it was worth (two denars)37Obviously, the numbers have to be switched since 1 < 2. and when it was seeded (one denar), with that denar real estate should be bought and he reaps its yield.

Texts

  • Hebrew: The Jerusalem Talmud, edition by Heinrich W. Guggenheimer. Berlin, De Gruyter, 1999-2015 · License: CC-BY
  • English: The Jerusalem Talmud, translation and commentary by Heinrich W. Guggenheimer. Berlin, De Gruyter, 1999-2015 · License: CC-BY

Where next